Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
I was just trying to help keep you from sounding like an idiot. The math model seduction is apparently worse than I thought. If you are talking about my assertion that phase and direction of current flow are related, I suggest you demonstrate 0+j0.5 amps of current and tell us which of the two possible directions in a transmission line that imaginary current is flowing. So you disagree that 1 amp at 180 degrees is flowing in the opposite direction to 1 amp at zero degrees? If not, why do you disagree that 1 amp at 170 degrees is flowing in the opposite direction of 1 amp at 10 degrees? The direction of current flow is the cosine of the phase angle. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |