| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil Moore wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: Convention dictates that current alternates in direction, and that standing waves don't. They stand. Heh, heh, the seduction by the math model is worse than I thought. It's not so much a matter of being better or worse than you thought. It's just different than what you think. You don't really believe that standing waves don't alternate in direction, do you? I don't think anyone believes that standing waves alternate in direction. Most people know that standing waves are stationary, and that alternating current flows in alternating directions. But the two things are not one in the same. You need to think more carefully about what a standing wave is. Sorry for the dangling prep. The standing wave current changes phase by 180 degrees every half cycle. At a given point is space alternating current changes phase continuously. But standing waves don't change position, and don't have a direction, let alone a *CHANGE* in direction. The current plot on your web page shows a standing wave plot of alterating current magnitude as a function of position. The phase at each position changes continuously with time. Listen carefully. The plot indicates the magnitude (and potentially a phase) of an alternating current as a function of position. The phase at each position changes continuously with time. It's RF AC, but it's not a traveling wave plot. It's not a matter of current flow into or current flow out of; for a standing wave plot it's a matter of the magnitude of current flowing *AT* the specific positions. The current is alternating equally in both directions. There isn't a *net* current flow. 73, Jim AC6XG There exists no "reality" in which more current "goes in" one end of a device than "comes out" the other. But Jim, the original argument was that the current into the coil is the same magnitude and phase as the current out of the coil. But Cecil, the original argument wouldn't have been as big an argument if it had been more accurately stated. Or more precisely, if you hadn't subsequently misstated the facts Yuri had disclosed. It's true that the standing wave current at one end of the coil is greater than it is at the other end. You and I both know why that is so. But there are only so many ways that can be accurately stated before things begin to head off into the ridiculous, the obtuse, and the sublime - directions you have a marked propensity for taking. Reel it back in just a bit. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||