Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
You plotted I as a function of position for your antenna standing wave plots. It's the topic of discussion. That was a snapshot by EZNEC, frozen in time, Jim. Here's what the standing wave current looks like when it is not frozen in time. That's the topic of discussion that everyone seems to want to avoid. Standing waves don't stand still. They probably should have been called "looping waves". http://einstein.byu.edu/~masong/HTMs...newave2EX.html -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |