| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"Nope, it`s not. (phase difference between forward and reflected waves locked in phase)." At any specific point on a transmission line, the phase angle between the incident and reflected waves is unvarying. That`s what makes standing waves. At any specific point on a transmission line, the incident wave arrives a fixed number of degrees after its departure from the transmitter.If there is a reflected wave it is delayed by the time it takes to travel the route of the incident wave, plus the delay in traveling the aditional path to the reflection point. Then, either the voltage or the current is going to experience a phase reversal upon reflection. If the load impedance on the transmission line is too high, the current undergoes a phase reversal upon reflection. If the load impedance on the transmission line is too low, the voltage undergoes a phase reversal upon reflection. Then the reflected wave still must take more time to come back from its reflection point to the point "P" on the line where we are considering the phases and magnitudes of the incident and reflected waves. Terman says on page 95 of his 1955 4th edition: "However, irrespective of the relative amplitudes of incident and reflected waves, the phase of both voltage and current will advance exactly pi radians (180-degrees) when the distance toward the generator decreases by a half wavelength. Although in the absence of a reflected wave the variation in phase is at a uniform rate within this distance, this is not the case when a reflected wave is present." Terman is looking at the sums of incident and reflected waves above. Back on page 89 he was considering incident and reflected waves separately when there has has been a reflection from an open circuit. Terman says: "Consider now how these two waves behave as distance l from the load increases. The incident wave advances in phase beta radians per unit length, while the reflected wave lags correspondingly; at the same time magnitudes do not change greatly when the attenuation constant alpha is small." Terman is saying that as you look at points closer to the generator you aare looking at the emerging wave sooner in its history, but for the reflected wave the same points show the wave after it has more history paradoxically as you move closer to the generator. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||