Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yuri,
I think you're missing the point - just as Cecil is. You seem to have forgotten that I agree with the idea that there is a current gradient across these inductors - just as there is a current gradient along any quarter wavelength of transmission line with standing waves. That doesn't mean there's more current "going in one end" than is "coming out of the other end." It's a sophomoric notion. Do you wanna be a simpleton? You're almost there with this nonsense. Why do you want to screw up a valid idea by attaching a ridiculous one to it? 73, Jim AC6XG OK, so it is more current "coming out in one end", than is "coming in at the other end"? Is this what IS is? The argument was "virtually same" vs. "different" (gradient, more at one end than the other, etc.) Are we taking off on tangents to muddy the waters? I am almost done with cleaning the "lab", wx is warming up, I will soon get out, do more tests and finish the article. More articles I see in publications, more perpetuation of the wrong picture and idea that current is the same in loading coils. Even QEX and new Antenna Book keep on misleading. Yuri, K3BU/m |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |