Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:27:15 -0600, 'Doc wrote:
| | |Wes, | Do you really think that it makes ~that~ much |difference? | 'Doc Yes... or no... or maybe, depending on what "it" is and how much difference "it" does or does not make. Regards, Wes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:43:07 -0700, Wes Stewart
wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:27:15 -0600, 'Doc wrote: | | |Wes, | Do you really think that it makes ~that~ much |difference? | 'Doc Yes... or no... or maybe, depending on what "it" is and how much difference "it" does or does not make. Regards, Wes Hi Wes, The difference in your examination satisfyingly amounts to: 1.) the absence of ego towering over the problem; 1a.) the corresponding lack of sneer review that reduces the argument to "you won't change my mind"; 2.) the presence of clear unequivocal study of the problem; 3.) less than 1dB. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:44:50 GMT, Richard Clark
wrote: |On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:43:07 -0700, Wes Stewart |wrote: |On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:27:15 -0600, 'Doc wrote: || || ||Wes, || Do you really think that it makes ~that~ much ||difference? || 'Doc | |Yes... or no... or maybe, depending on what "it" is and how much |difference "it" does or does not make. |Regards, |Wes | |Hi Wes, | |The difference in your examination satisfyingly amounts to: |1.) the absence of ego towering over the problem; |1a.) the corresponding lack of sneer review that | reduces the argument to "you won't change my mind"; |2.) the presence of clear unequivocal study of the problem; |3.) less than 1dB. Thanks! Wes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nothing on that post
"Richard Clark" wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:43:07 -0700, Wes Stewart wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:27:15 -0600, 'Doc wrote: | | |Wes, | Do you really think that it makes ~that~ much |difference? | 'Doc Yes... or no... or maybe, depending on what "it" is and how much difference "it" does or does not make. Regards, Wes Hi Wes, The difference in your examination satisfyingly amounts to: 1.) the absence of ego towering over the problem; 1a.) the corresponding lack of sneer review that reduces the argument to "you won't change my mind"; 2.) the presence of clear unequivocal study of the problem; 3.) less than 1dB. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 23:13:26 GMT, " Art Unwin KB9MZ"
wrote: Nothing on that post Hi Wes, The difference in your examination satisfyingly amounts to: 1.) the absence of ego towering over the problem; 1a.) the corresponding lack of sneer review that reduces the argument to "you won't change my mind"; 2.) the presence of clear unequivocal study of the problem; 3.) less than 1dB. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Still less than 1 dB |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |