| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:44:50 GMT, Richard Clark
wrote: |On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:43:07 -0700, Wes Stewart |wrote: |On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:27:15 -0600, 'Doc wrote: || || ||Wes, || Do you really think that it makes ~that~ much ||difference? || 'Doc | |Yes... or no... or maybe, depending on what "it" is and how much |difference "it" does or does not make. |Regards, |Wes | |Hi Wes, | |The difference in your examination satisfyingly amounts to: |1.) the absence of ego towering over the problem; |1a.) the corresponding lack of sneer review that | reduces the argument to "you won't change my mind"; |2.) the presence of clear unequivocal study of the problem; |3.) less than 1dB. Thanks! Wes |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||