| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Kelley wrote:
My point is that statements like "more current goes in one end than comes out the other" are not helpful or illustrative of the phenomenon. Were you to avoid such statements, you would likely receive less resistance to the idea you're trying to convey. Understand? Why would it make any difference to say the magnitude of net current in is greater than the magnitude of net current out? "Greater than" and "more" mean the same thing. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||