Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil wrote,
(snip) I am amazed that you disagree with Kraus. If your math disagrees with reality, it is simply wrong and has turned into a religious belief. You are free to worship at the alter of mathematics but please don't expect the rest of us scientists to join you there. A transmission line in a distributed network can reverse the phase of the signals. A coil in a distributed network can reverse the phase of the signals. Do you really expect anyone to believe that a one wavelength long helical antenna can exist without phase reversals? If so, you have just re-written the laws of physics. The Catholic priests 500 years ago believed their religion was superior to reality. Today, you believe your sacred cow math models are superior to reality. I don't see an iota of difference between those two positions. Math models cannot be used to verify reality. It is supposed to be the opposite situation. I guess I should expect you to put me under house arrest as the next step in shutting me up. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp This is vintage Moore. I know you're never going to admit that you don't understand this stuff. That's fine. I'm going to leave the field to you and your pal, Jim, until the next time you start trying to pawn off your simple ideas as The Truth. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |