| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Harrison wrote:
Inductors are used to replace a missing length of an antenna which often would be located at the inductor. The coil is an antenna length surrogate. Its delay and impedance characteristics match that of the missing length of straight wire. Hi Richard, I know what you mean and it is not an *exact* match. (And you did not say or imply that it was an exact match.) From a 1/4WL monopole to a loaded mobile antenna, the feedpoint impedance can drop from about 35 ohms to about 12 ohms. That probably means that the in-phase reflected current has increased from one configuration to the other and the out-of-phase reflected voltage has also increased. In other words, the antenna reflection coefficient is higher for the loaded monopole which would make it less efficient. We know that, at resonance, the net feedpoint voltage is in phase with the net feedpoint current. But the component forward and reflected currents do not have to be in phase. And the component forward and reflected voltages do not have to be 180 degrees out of phase. In fact, there is a considerable amount of interference going on at the feedpoint of a standing-wave antenna. If one calculates or measures the s11 reflection coefficient s-parameter at the feedpoint of a dipole, it will have a magnitude in the ballpark of about 0.85 -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||