"AndyS" wrote in news:1169524019.256493.196630
@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:

working just fine...... At HF, it isn't unusual to have 30uv/m of
"noise", from cosmic or galactic or whatever... A 20 db noise
figure is just fine for a receiver in those ranges...... The biggest
challenge is man-made interference ......


Dan,

Some more information on expected ambient noise per ITU-R p.372-8 is in my
article at http://www.vk1od.net/fsm/FSAmbientNoise.htm . For 3.6MHz, it is
probably wise to expect ambient noise field strength somewhere around
6dBuV/m in 2kHz bandwidth in a residential environment. If an antenna can
develop more than about -130dBm in the receiver from that field strength,
the S/N should be ok on most modern SSB receivers which have a noise floor
somewhere around -136dBm. If you were in a quieter environment, you would
benefit from a better antenna.

Owen

Owen,

Thank you. The environment is medium density residential. I am listening
to a net regularly on 3970kc. I have limited space and cannot rig a half
wave dipole and am looking for alternatives.

Frequently a station close by picks up stations I cannot hear. I am
looking for small space alternatives. Given that that station is in the
same 'cosmic' noise environment what characteristics create a superior
s/n ratio?

For receive only is a ferrite core a good alternative?

- Dan

Owen Duffy wrote:
"AndyS" wrote in news:1169524019.256493.196630
@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:

working just fine...... At HF, it isn't unusual to have 30uv/m of
"noise", from cosmic or galactic or whatever... A 20 db noise
figure is just fine for a receiver in those ranges...... The biggest
challenge is man-made interference ......


Dan,

Some more information on expected ambient noise per ITU-R p.372-8 is in my
article at http://www.vk1od.net/fsm/FSAmbientNoise.htm . For 3.6MHz, it is
probably wise to expect ambient noise field strength somewhere around
6dBuV/m in 2kHz bandwidth in a residential environment. If an antenna can
develop more than about -130dBm in the receiver from that field strength,
the S/N should be ok on most modern SSB receivers which have a noise floor
somewhere around -136dBm. If you were in a quieter environment, you would
benefit from a better antenna.

Owen

dansawyeror wrote in
:

Owen,

Thank you. The environment is medium density residential. I am
listening to a net regularly on 3970kc. I have limited space and
cannot rig a half wave dipole and am looking for alternatives.

Frequently a station close by picks up stations I cannot hear. I am
looking for small space alternatives. Given that that station is in
the same 'cosmic' noise environment what characteristics create a
superior s/n ratio?

If you looked at the reference material I gave you, you will see that you
might expect the ambient noise in a residential environment to develop
about -83dBm in a 2kHz wide rx with a lossless antenna.

If your receiver noise floor was say -136dBm (Noise Figure about 5dB, a
state of the art HF receiver), and you wanted a 6dB margin to restrict
degradation of the "off-air" S/N to 1dB, then your antenna needs to have
gain of at least ( -136 - -83 + 6 )dBi, or -47dBi. That is not very
difficult to achieve, even with a ferrite loop antenna.

Owen

On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:12:02 -0800, dansawyeror
wrote:

For receive only is a ferrite core a good alternative?

Hi Dan,

Yes, but only insofar as it is balanced and gives you sharp nulls to
help eliminate some of the interference. This may require elevating
it away from reflecting surfaces if it is not shielded.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Owen,

Thank you. The environment is medium density residential. I am listening
to a net regularly on 3970kc. I have limited space and cannot rig a half
wave dipole and am looking for alternatives.

Frequently a station close by picks up stations I cannot hear. I am
looking for small space alternatives. Given that that station is in the
same 'cosmic' noise environment what characteristics create a superior
s/n ratio?

For receive only is a ferrite core a good alternative?

- Dan

Owen Duffy wrote:
"AndyS" wrote in news:1169524019.256493.196630
@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:

working just fine...... At HF, it isn't unusual to have 30uv/m of
"noise", from cosmic or galactic or whatever... A 20 db noise
figure is just fine for a receiver in those ranges...... The biggest
challenge is man-made interference ......


Dan,

Some more information on expected ambient noise per ITU-R p.372-8 is in my
article at http://www.vk1od.net/fsm/FSAmbientNoise.htm . For 3.6MHz, it is
probably wise to expect ambient noise field strength somewhere around
6dBuV/m in 2kHz bandwidth in a residential environment. If an antenna can
develop more than about -130dBm in the receiver from that field strength,
the S/N should be ok on most modern SSB receivers which have a noise floor
somewhere around -136dBm. If you were in a quieter environment, you would
benefit from a better antenna.

Owen

Owen Duffy wrote:

Dan,

Some more information on expected ambient noise per ITU-R p.372-8 is in my
article at http://www.vk1od.net/fsm/FSAmbientNoise.htm . For 3.6MHz, it is
probably wise to expect ambient noise field strength somewhere around
6dBuV/m in 2kHz bandwidth in a residential environment. If an antenna can
develop more than about -130dBm in the receiver from that field strength,
the S/N should be ok on most modern SSB receivers which have a noise floor
somewhere around -136dBm. If you were in a quieter environment, you would
benefit from a better antenna.

Owen

Andy writes:
Thanks for posting the website, Owen.....
My comments were based on a residential/business site with a bandwidth
that
could accomodate AM, and I was generalizing .....

When I was designing LORAN (100khz) set sfor aircraft (TI2000) , I
needed to
find how small an external whip antenna could be... It turned out that
22
inches was sufficient, since a larger antenna which would convert more
signal, would also convert, proportionately, more noise......

I guess that's why whip antennae on AM car radio are only a couple
feet long, and why loopsticks work so well at AM broadcast.....

A nice article you wrote,.... thanks for giving the web reference...


Andy W4OAH, in Eureka, Texs