| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Changing the current distribution and changing the effective height are one
and the same thing. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg Edwards wrote:
Changing the current distribution and changing the effective height are one and the same thing. I can lower my angle of maximum radiation by raising the height of my low 75m dipole. Is there a way for me to accomplish the same thing by changing the current distribution? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg, G4FGQ wrote:
"Changing the current distribution and changing the effective height are one and the same thing." Could be. Antennas are reciprocal. A common definition of "effective height" for receiving antennas is simply the ratio of volts out of the antenna versus the field volts per meter acting upon the antenna. Constants provide effective height in feet, meters, or in the units of your choice. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Antenna Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
| Loading Coils & Numbers | Antenna | |||
| Loading Coils in 20th ARRL Antenna Book | Antenna | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||