Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Antennas led astray
"art" wrote in message ups.com... I responded to another person who posted his thoughts about patents on this very same thread! Art Jimmie D wrote: "art" wrote in message oups.com... Atta boy Jimmy if only somebody pursued just a little bit of what I present we all would gain by a debate but nobody but nobody got off the couch except one whose aims were dishonest. With respect to patents, very few if any is for a miracle it is only a platform for additional ideas to the present state of the art which is only generated by the micro steps of information in any art. When you apply that small piece of information you are suppling a basic for the next patent application which is what is called progress because it was shared and without sharing achievement is retarded. When people decry the idea of patents I think back to the fact that many engineers decried them after the fact but never decried their importance on a resume, just like monday morning quarterbacks Art Jimmie D wrote: "art" wrote in message ups.com... Before the mathematical equations comes about you must understand the concept, it is that which requires an open mind . We are not back in college where we take every thing in so we can pass an examination. Ask your self why dx/dt is nor included when a conservative field is described by the experts and then we have the beginnings of a debate where you can explain your points. Don't shoot the messenger! Art \ craigm wrote: how about some real math and equations. You should present some technical basis for your conclusions other than some verbal handwaving. You also seem to make some assumptions which are irrelevant ( parallelism being good for manufacturing being one) that may not be valid. As an engineer I can say that elements in a varying three dimensional form to each other is more difficult and more costly than parallism on a single plane, No amount of mathematical juggling will allow you to escape that analysis, but I am willing to debate around that point Art You are looking for open minds, but present nothing of substance. If you are not willing to try and understand the concept then your mind must be closed. Yes we can debate that to Art craigm In antennas the math is the concept. No one will ever have a clue how one works without understanding the math. May I suggest that everyone hold there responses until you say all you have to say encluding posting the relevant equations with references. This will be the only route fair to you and prevent the normal bickering. Your ideas if presented in a professional maner will recive a professional response. Jimmie Patents are almost useless unless you actually build something. Basically patents protect ideas and I know a guy who use to do hundreds of applictions on just ideas. It is not the purpose of a patent to establish that an idea is workable. It just establishes it as "your idea" Besides I thought we were talking about antennas, not the value of patents. Jimmie. So, lets get back to antennas, I really want to see your proofs of mathematical a mistake the masters made. Cant wait? Sincerely Jimmie. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|