Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Clark wrote: If it didn't oscillate (resonate actually in a magnetically biased electron fountain) at that frequency, it's probably Rubidium. What happens to its frequency of oscillation compared to a stationary observer as it approaches the speed of light? Pop that cesium atom with a hp pp laser and see if those vibs don't stray a bit ... Regards, JS |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith I wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Richard Clark wrote: If it didn't oscillate (resonate actually in a magnetically biased electron fountain) at that frequency, it's probably Rubidium. What happens to its frequency of oscillation compared to a stationary observer as it approaches the speed of light? Pop that cesium atom with a hp pp laser and see if those vibs don't stray a bit ... Regards, JS a hp pp laser is not part of the mechanism used to measure cesium vibrations so your comment is irrelevant. Dave N |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David G. Nagel wrote:
... a hp pp laser is not part of the mechanism used to measure cesium vibrations so your comment is irrelevant. Dave N No, not irrelevant--but, perhaps a poor example, but still, it should serve ... If the darn cesium atom won't vibrate consistently at the same freq, you are asking me to base beliefs on it? look-of-shock-and-awe! If something as simple as a high power pin-point laser can affect it ... Regards, JS |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:14:29 -0800, John Smith I
wrote: David G. Nagel wrote: ... a hp pp laser is not part of the mechanism used to measure cesium vibrations so your comment is irrelevant. Dave N No, not irrelevant--but, perhaps a poor example, but still, it should serve ... What, a poor example? GIGO. If the darn cesium atom won't vibrate consistently at the same freq, you are asking me to base beliefs on it? look-of-shock-and-awe! Your belief system makes an unwarranted presumption - THAT is the basis of poor belief, not the atom's resonance. If something as simple as a high power pin-point laser can affect it ... Another presumption. Perhaps true, useful, but it doesn't invalidate the simple mechanics. Failure is easy to achieve - it is celebrated in a speech before Congress every year. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
... Richard: You probably won't believe this, but I believe if I place a glass of water in my microwave and nuke it, I affect the vibration plane of the water molecules in there!!! Warmest regards, JS |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:15:28 -0800, John Smith I
wrote: You probably won't believe this, but I believe if I place a glass of water in my microwave and nuke it, I affect the vibration plane of the water molecules in there!!! Sounds like the warm beginnings of a new religion if it didn't burn your feet while out for a stroll. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|