Jimmie D wrote:
Units of measurement are totally arbitrary, what they are measuring isnt.

So a standard unit of measurement can change value
daily in an unknown fashion and still yield non-arbirtary
results?
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
et...
Jimmie D wrote:
Units of measurement are totally arbitrary, what they are measuring isnt.

So a standard unit of measurement can change value
daily in an unknown fashion and still yield non-arbirtary
results?
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Theorectically yes, practically no. But this is just something you came up
with and has nothing to do with what I said.. My total message was not so
long that it needed to be snipped , it is obvious why you did. If you just
want to argue and do so by taking what somone says out of context please put
me on your kill file .

Jimmie D wrote:
My total message was not so
long that it needed to be snipped , it is obvious why you did. If you just
want to argue and do so by taking what somone says out of context please put
me on your kill file .

It is obvious that honoring netnews guidelines requires
snipping the part of the message to which I am not replying.
Have you read the netnews guidelines?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:

Jimmie D wrote:

Units of measurement are totally arbitrary, what they are measuring isnt.


So a standard unit of measurement can change value
daily in an unknown fashion and still yield non-arbirtary
results?

You'd have to be able to demonstrate that relativistic effects single
out particular units of measurement to the exclusion of others without
having an effect on the observed phenomena and all within the same
reference frame before being able to substantiate any claim that the
result of a particular measurement is arbitrary. Can you demonstrate
that?

jk

Jim Kelley wrote:
You'd have to be able to demonstrate that relativistic effects single
out particular units of measurement to the exclusion of others without
having an effect on the observed phenomena and all within the same
reference frame before being able to substantiate any claim that the
result of a particular measurement is arbitrary. Can you demonstrate that?

Relativistic effects certainly single out measurements
of time - also length in the direction of velocity.

It has been demonstrated numerous times that the velocity
of a clock affects the length of its second. What is
the velocity of the cesium clock on Earth?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
You'd have to be able to demonstrate that relativistic effects single
out particular units of measurement to the exclusion of others without
having an effect on the observed phenomena and all within the same
reference frame before being able to substantiate any claim that the
result of a particular measurement is arbitrary. Can you demonstrate that?

Relativistic effects certainly single out measurements
of time - also length in the direction of velocity.

It has been demonstrated numerous times that the velocity
of a clock affects the length of its second. What is
the velocity of the cesium clock on Earth?

Zero by definition.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote:

...
of a clock affects the length of its second. What is
the velocity of the cesium clock on Earth?

Zero by definition.


Now, that is quite easily proved to be FALSE.

The earth is 25,000 miles in circumference, it makes one revolution a day.

25,000mph/24hrs is over 1,000mph. As you sit there typing you are
traveling over 1,000mph, and so is every cesium clock on earth.

JS

wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
It has been demonstrated numerous times that the velocity
of a clock affects the length of its second. What is
the velocity of the cesium clock on Earth?

Zero by definition.

Just as the Earth was the center of the universe by
definition.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:

...
Just as the Earth was the center of the universe by
definition.

Let's ask NASA how they keep the atomic clock on board the space station
in sync with those on earth? Even in synchronous orbit, that space
station has to "race" (travel faster) to keep up ...

Regards,
JS