Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jimmie D" wrote in
: "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:22:38 GMT, Dave Oldridge wrote: The same problem still exists. The cesium atom didn't exist before the first super nova. How can the time be calculated between the Big Bang and the first super nova if cesium didn't exist? There are other entropic processes that can be calibrated against the cesium. Hi Dave, You have been snookered into answering a complaint manufactured (as usual) from the misapplication of relationships. The resonance of Cesium is not a function of time. Time is not a function of Cesium's resonance (the incorrect correlation drawn, to which you are responding). There is no dependency between the two. It is our dependency in our usage of one to measure the other. The sophism above is much like saying sound did not exist before someone was close enough to hear the falling tree. The excitation of gas molecules we call sound existed long before the appearance of the first amoeba, much less apes in falling trees. Both sound and time are phenomenological terms for simple and rational physical processes that exist without dependence on us. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Yes, time is about as much related to the vibration of a cesium atom as it is to the pendulum im my grandfather clock. Except we now define its unit in terms of the oscillations of a cesium atom. And sure, it's relative. But, in the same reference frame as the observer, the cesium clock is sufficient. -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|