Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 24, 12:32 pm, Michael Coslo wrote: I'm putting together a homebrew mobile antenna based more or less on "20 dollar mobile antenna" that appeared in QST some years ago. For those not familiar, the antenna consists of a tapped coil at the bottom, a spiral wound lower section, a tapped loading coil, and an upper stinger. My question involves that spiral wound lower section. What would this be thought of? As antenna below the loading coil, as an inductor in addition to the other two, or some sort of hybrid of antenna/inductor? How would this be modeled in EZNEC? Apologies in advance if this was an incredibly stupid thing to ask! 8^) - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - Basically the same as my "plastic bugcatchers" I make out of old CB and ham fiberglass antennas. The spiral just adds a bit more inductance. How tight, and how many turns would determine the overall loading. IE: just a few spiral turns won't do much for 80m. Your bigger lumped coil is going to be doing most of the dirty work. The spiral will just add a bit. But on the higher bands like 10m, that spiral could have quite a bit of effect on tuning. Myself, I don't use the lower spiral section. Those smaller coil turns are more lossy than using the bigger lumped coil. It's really best to just use a straight lower section, and have all the loading at the center lumped coil. That coil is higher Q, and more efficient. You don't want to degrade things by using the lower Q lower spiral windings, when you have a big coil above those. My present best antenna is a 6 ft 20 meter hamstick that I butchered up. I did away with all the thin coil windings, but kept enough wire so I could have a fairly straight section at the bottom. I'll wrap maybe a turn or two just to keep it in place better, but I don't consider it part of the coil. I wanted max performance. So..Instead of placing the coil at the center of the fiberglass whip, I mounted it nearly at the top. The top one foot of the six foot whip is where the coil is. Then I have a 5 ft stinger whip attached to the top of the glass whip. That makes it a true center fed, with 5 ft under and above the coil. The tapped coil at the bottom is the matching device. That can vary to the install.. The higher you can mount the loading coil, the better, unless maybe the stinger is too short. I don't have that problem with a 5 ft stinger. The antenna is a stout talker. Even on 80m. And didn't cost me a cent. All was junk I aquired... BTW, for added effect, I often extend the base below the coil with a 3 ft hustler mast. In that case, I have 8 ft below the coil, and 5 above. In that "parked" mode, it really kicks butt. Mine tunes 80-17 with the 5 ft stinger. On 15-12-10, I use shorter fixed length stingers to tune, with the coil bypassed. Naturally, the usual low band 11 ft antenna is a bit tall for the highest bands.. :/. I actually don't work the higher bands much. I'm on 40 in the day, 80 at night most all the time. But I can work all the others if I want to. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Bose Wave Radio - What's Your Opinion ? | Shortwave | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
Question...mobile antenna "thinking out of the box"... | CB |