Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KE5MBX" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 3, 9:06 pm, "Jimmie D" wrote: "KE5MBX" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 3, 2:02 pm, Cecil Moore wrote: KE5MBX wrote: I'm still really interested in the cophasing thing. I have mounted a CB whip on the roll bar before, but it has two disadvantages: Extreme height of the antenna and the inability to close the soft top while the antenna's up. Could I not cophase diagonally and therefore center the patten ? First a few thoughts. Co-phasing doubles the cost of the antenna without outperforming a single whip (unless the elements are separated by 1/4WL or more). So why not a magmount on the hood with a single whip? That would be my solution but I'm not very "cool". :-) My contacts could not tell the difference between the magmount on the roof of my pickup Vs on my hood. Phasing would work best front-to-back. With 135 degree phasing in elements separated by 1/8WL, a whopping 4 dB gain is possible switchable from front to back. If 1/4WL spacing is possible, bidirectional front and back gain of 3.5 dB is possible with 180 degree phasing. If I were driving an 18 wheeler, this is what I would do. Changing the phasing to 90 degrees would give me a front or back vertical beam. There's no reason why your co-phasing idea will not work. The feedpoint impedance of the two elements in parallel will be 1/2 of the impedance of each element transformed by the length of coax chosen. If you put the coax 'T' 1/4WL back from each element, the impedance at that point should be close to the feedpoint impedance of each element (assuming 35 ohms). -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Excellent.. If I put my antennas on opposite corners of the Jeep as I was thinking, I find that they will be 4.2 meters apart. I promise to go home and see what the ARRL handbook says about cophasing, but I only understood what you just told me partially. Are you describing a way to get better front/back gain from a system with one antenna in front and one in back, as opposed to the conventional "trucker" setup? I have no particular use for directional gain on 10 meters, by the way. I know a lot of people are reluctant to do the superior front-to-back cophasing because it looks goofy, but I can assure I'm not interested in being "cool" either! I want the most efficient 10-m operation I can get out of a Jeep Wrangler. Just go with one antenna. With all due respect, Jimmie, I am looking into creating a better antenna system than the conventional dipole-on-the-back-of-the-CJ, even if it was adequate for you. I like antenna theory. I do to, but I also have learned from experience. I think co-phased mobiles has become just a CB trick to sell more antennas. I do undurstand it has a pratical side when truckers use them to overcome blind spots but this is nt needed on a small vehicle(more experience). Where else have you ever seen dual antennas except for CB. Let me be the last one who would ever discourage a person from learning by trying as I have tried some really wierd stuff before. Jimmie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
judge recognizes cell phones and radios as same thing. in effect, outlaws using all mobile transcievers in the U.S. | Scanner | |||
Mobile 2m/70cm antenna | Antenna | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
BOLO STOLEN XTL5000 mobiles here are serials and models | Swap | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy |