Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Bob:
It is nice to hear from another of W8JK's boys. You have received some good ideas and discussion. Having dealt with the underlining need you described, the technical issues usually turn out to be minor as compared to the people issues. What you are likely most to need is a sharp people-person who can uncover what the real reasons are for the apparent need for invisibility. Once you know what the actual issue is, you can work to optimize the system. You must have the clout, once you understand the people issues, to convince the right people about an effective antenna system. My preference is a dipole with about 100 feet of wire on each side that is supported in the middle by a 40 foot tower. From the feed point to the base of the tower I would run a piece of solid-outer coax that is heavily choked with surrounding choking-material. At the base, I would attach a commercial auto-tuner and run its coax and control cables (well choked) underground to the station. An embellishment would be a second dipole at right angles (connected to the first dipole) that is resonant around 5.4 MHz. A good fence around the tower is desirable. Feel free to contact me. 73 Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: "Bob Dixon" wrote in message |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mahoning Freq | Scanner | |||
Idine Ghoreishian -by- Idine Ghoreishian { The SPGC Antenna by RHF } | Shortwave | |||
K1MAN The crap has hit the fan. | Policy | |||
a great read | CB |