Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Feb, 07:52, "art" wrote:
On 14 Feb, 07:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote: "art" wrote in message oups.com... On 13 Feb, 22:18, "Jerry Martes" wrote: "Bobby" wrote in message roups.com... All, How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from RHCP to LHCP. Any ideas on the equation or where I can find it will be helpful. Thanks. Bobby. Hi Bobby If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally insensitive to LHCP. If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to Circular. Jerry You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating to dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to totally isolate those too.? Art Hi Art I may make mistakes by using non scientific terms. When I read my post, I realize that nothing is actually defined by my above statement. I would submit that a LHCP antenna will receive no RHCP signal. I'm sure you know that any linearly polarized antenna is insensitive to linearly polarized signals that are orthogonal to the line of polarity of that antenna. Tell me more about the "weather antennas". What frequency do they use? Where do they transmit from? Jerry- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Weather experts have found that using both horizontal and vertical polarizations coming from the same antenna tho in separate pulses that with oncomming clouds and weather systems that the received picture is more defined where size of droplets can be determined as well as other things. I would suggest that things like wind shear would also be more discernable. My antennas because elements are non defined in placement to each other are capable of multi polarizations which is why I posed the question. Art- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If you put that same question to Google it would be more informative. Apparently every forward thinking nations have scientists dabbling with it funded by the concern with global warming. I find this all very interesting because as a ham I had been concentrating on vertical and horizontal polarizations only Seems like space has opened up the antenna field such that many will be able to review the path that antennas have taken over the last century that have appeared to stymy progress and with an open mind change course Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
Part # 2 - The Simplest Shortwave Listener (SWL) Antennas That I Know Of . . . | Shortwave | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |