Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How do you determine the axial ratio from a RHCP wave to a LHCP wave
from an antenna? In essence, I need an axial ratio transformation from RHCP to LHCP. If you are working with an antenna that radiates RHCP it is totally insensitive to LHCP. If you have an antenna that radiates "RHCP" (or LHCP) the axial ratio is the ratio of the Minor axis to the Major axis of the E field. So, it varies from zero to one as the radiated field varies from Linear to Circular. You mentioned insensetivity above, are there any other polarities insensitive to others ? I note that weather antennas are now migrating to dual diversity antennas for horizontal and vertical, is it possible to totally isolate those too.? I may make mistakes by using non scientific terms. When I read my post, I realize that nothing is actually defined by my above statement. I would submit that a LHCP antenna will receive no RHCP signal. I'm sure you know that any linearly polarized antenna is insensitive to linearly polarized signals that are orthogonal to the line of polarity of that antenna. Weather experts have found that using both horizontal and vertical polarizations coming from the same antenna tho in separate pulses that with oncomming clouds and weather systems that the received picture is more defined where size of droplets can be determined as well as other things. Lots of questions, lots of possible answers.. here goes: 1) While a theoretical antenna of one polarization sense is insensitive to the opposite sense, in reality, antennas are perfect, particularly "off boresight". that's what axial ratio tells you.. how "perfect" is the CP (1 is perfect, 0 is a linear pol, non circular antenna). Think of it as a continuum from a straight line (linear) to a circle. Elliptical pol is the general case, and axial ratio is the ratio between the major and minor axes of the ellipse (to fully specify the antenna, you'd also need to specify the angle of one of the axes and the "handed ness") 2) The radiation from an antenna, in a particular direction, can be represented by a linear combination of two orthogonal polarizations (orthogonal here has a special meaning... two linear pols separated by 90 degrees is but one case). The two popular systems are CP and linear (that is you say that the field is (a+bj) horizontal + (c+dj) vertical. You can do the same for RHCP and LHCP. (and, actually, for any two linear pols that are different). This is one way to "make" a cp antenna (combine two linear antennas with the right relative amplitudes and phases). 3) bear in mind that an antenna may be perfectly CP on boresight (axial ratio=1) and not CP in other directions. In fact, it can be proved that no antenna can have the same polarization everywhere (see the "hairy ball theorem") Much more info can be found on the web.. wikipedia has an entry on polarization,antenna books talk about it (Orfanidis' book is online at Rutgers) Kraus has a nice discussion (particularly appropriate since axial mode helical antennas are particularly good at being CP) Now to weather radar... spherical particles (raindrops) are perfect "depolarizers"... send any pol to the droplet, and what comes back is equally distributed between both pols. (spheres are used as cal targets for this reason) ice crystals, on the other hand, show significant polarization effects. Since the polarization effects are also "size of particle" dependent (relative to wavelength) you can also figure out things like particle size distribution. that way you can tell the difference between a few big raindrops and lots of little raindrops. Most other physical phenomena show some polarization effects, which is heavily used in radar remote sensing. You transmit radar pulses of two different polarizations, and receive the returns with a dual pol receiver, so you essentially get 4 different complex numbers (HH, HV, VV, VH, for linear pol) for the backscatter. An example might be looking at forests.. in the summer, when they have their leaves on, they pretty much randomize the polarization, but in the winter, the Hpol backscatter is very different from the Vpol backscatter. Plowed soil has a very different polarization signature from flat earth. Conifers look different from broadleaf plants. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
Part # 2 - The Simplest Shortwave Listener (SWL) Antennas That I Know Of . . . | Shortwave | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |