Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sal M. Onella wrote:
I have very few ideas for correcting the original sleeve design. What are the resonant frequencies and feedpoint resistances for the two types of feeds? There's no rule that says the antenna must be 50 ohms at resonance. A 2.8:1 SWR could just be an indication that the feedpoint impedance at resonance is 18 + j0 ohms. Did you do anything to choke the common-mode currents on the feedline? If not, those currents can upset the SWR meter reading. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message .. . Sal M. Onella wrote: I have very few ideas for correcting the original sleeve design. What are the resonant frequencies and feedpoint resistances for the two types of feeds? I will need to re-borrow my buddy and his analyzer. We just took readings but no notes. (Yes, I know better.) There's no rule that says the antenna must be 50 ohms at resonance. A 2.8:1 SWR could just be an indication that the feedpoint impedance at resonance is 18 + j0 ohms. Agree. However, the venerable Kenwood TS-120 says to keep the VSWR under 1.5:1. So, my first attempt is a bad antenna for the intended purpose. Did you do anything to choke the common-mode currents on the feedline? If not, those currents can upset the SWR meter reading. No. That was careless of me. Four turns of the coax if I remember correctly from an earlier discussion here. Thus, the first attempt may not be a bad antenna but a bad measurement. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|