Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, I take that answer...now, why did the FCC go with an ERP as that
would require calculation rather than a measurement. Hard to measure ERP as far as I know... Oh well, go figure! Scott N0EDV Dave wrote: Scott wrote: So, hows does an armchair operator (one who doesn't have $10K worth of test equipment) determine the efficiency of the antenna? Scott N0EDV SNIPPED There are two easy methods and one rule of thumb method that will get you into the ballpark. 1) As Cecil replied, divide the radiation resistance by the feedpoint resistance. EZNEC will give a reasonable value for radiation resistance and an MFJ 259B [~$250] will give a measure of the feedpoint resistance. 2) A freeware program, mobile antenna, will also calculate the efficiency. 3) [Rule of thumb] The gain is proportional to the effective aperture in square wavelengths. So, as mentioned in another reply, approximately, the ratio of length of the mobile antenna [~8 feet] to the length of a 1/2 wavelength antenna for 60 meters [~93 feet] yields 8.6% efficiency. So, 100 watts from an IC-706 [series] yields ~9 watts effective radiated power. Conclusion, 50 watts ERP on 60 meters with a 9% efficient antenna would require 555 watts into the antenna. /s/ DD |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Index for IC-756 Pro III Instruction Manual (A-6378H-1EX, 2004) | General | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
BOLO STOLEN XTL5000 mobiles here are serials and models | Swap | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy |