Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote in news:QeJEh.2909$8x.1740
@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net: Owen Duffy wrote: Cecil, it seems that between the two of you, you are constructing a picture that (in a lossless line for simplicity) if the Bird 43 reads 100W forward and 50 watts reflected, the power radiated (ignoring antenna ohmic losses) is 100W, but 50W is reflected toward the transmitter... but that's allright because the 50W will be reflected by a Zo matched PA, and energy is conserved on the line. Please don't insult our intelligence. If the Bird reads Of course it is nonsense, but it is a logical development based on Jeff's words "What you are describing could be called 'transmitted' power or power delivered into a mismatched load, but that it different from forward power, or the power delivered by the source" and your words "For systems Z0-matched by an antenna tuner, the situation becomes trivial to understand. The reflected energy is re-reflected by the Z0-match provided by the properly tuned antenna tuner". The steady state solution of the ratio of V/I at the input to a real transmission line section (ie lossy) that has a load of some arbitrary impedance is solved using equations that do not include forward and reflected power terms. The power at any point is the real part of V*conjugate(I) at that point, no matter whether it is at the source, load, line input, output or anywhere along the line. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
Outside Antenna | Shortwave | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |