Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:15:38 -0800, Jim Kelley
wrote: Not that I dispute anything here necessarily, but I would like to know how you went about measuring the reflected power dissipated within a source. Also, how the power being dissipated? Hi Jim, Dissipation is caloric, however it can arrive catastrophically by one of two mechanisms; and they reflect, no pun here, the two types of phase sense offered by the random opportunity (being phase adding or subtracting for current or voltage as the occasion demands). One caloric method is simple in measuring the heat load expressed by airflow temperature measurements in a confined volume. When I designed the Flight Recorder, the FAA mandated a heat budget for its acceptance. This is certainly far afield from the immediate topic, but it responds to the attention offered in design to this issue. The point of this sidebar is that efficiency translated immediately into temperature and this was rigorously anticipated and tested. The same design philosophy is mandated in RF final design and considerable attention has been devoted to it in the trade papers. Returning to our concerns, for certain phase combinations that caloric solution can arrive suddenly in the form of an arc. Most operators will immediately act to correct that situation and the heat build up may not be great, but the damage may still be irreversible. This harkens back to my discussion of a kitchen table laser cracking a window pane. Average power may be unspectacular, but instantaneous power, localized, can be very dramatic and destructive beyond expectation (it certainly surprised my friend). For other phase combinations that caloric solution can arrive gradually (heat soaking); and catastrophe arrives through thermal runaway. Operators rarely observe this until it is too late. I hope that the readers can differentiate between these two, and how certain designs (eg. solid state, and tube design) respond in these cases and correlate to experience each to their own characteristic failure mechanism. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
Outside Antenna | Shortwave | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |