On 5 Mar, 14:50, Gene Fuller wrote:
art wrote:

Gene,
last time you wrote to me you said you were dumber than a rock and I
took you at your word. I just read your last paragraph and I do not
understand a bit of it other than a collection of words. I have not
"invented" anything I have discovered something! "Nothing to validate
or invalidate?" Sorry but I now echo Roys normal statement Is it
refering to invention, discovery or the companionship of a rock?. Odd
thing is you are adressing it to me., What do you want from me or are
you reading from the bible or something such that you are soothed by
the echo of your speech? Shall we just say it is not all clear as you
surmised. I do admit to the idea that all is not known about antennas,
is that what this is all about? On top of all that no
one has faulted my analysis with authority so whats the beef? Why are
you throwing rocks?
Art

Art,

Let me put it in even simpler terms.

What you have "discovered" has been well known for over 100 years. Your
"discovery" was validated before any of us was born.

73,
Gene
W4SZ- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pray tell what I have discovered and what antenna program experience
are you drawing upon with respect to your statements. Now to the term
"validated". What does validated mean, is it a collective term? If so
what comprised as a group the term collective? And what in factwere
they validating and how. When and where would help to.
And you seem to be a group of one who recognises what discovery I have
found that it was known about years ago. So why not spit it out and
help out the readers so all know what you are disputing. What I have
uttered has not previously known/understood,even by the maestro Roy
because it is not in any book, and has not been utelised by anybody to
the best of my knoweledge. But you seem to have a handle on the whole
things so with steps of knowelege and logic give all of us the benefit
of your insight so I may advance my case. Again what's your beaf?
Art