Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 16:35, Gene Fuller wrote:
art wrote: On 5 Mar, 14:50, Gene Fuller wrote: Art, Let me put it in even simpler terms. What you have "discovered" has been well known for over 100 years. Your "discovery" was validated before any of us was born. What, where, when and where is it written? What, where, when and where is it written? Explain yourself 73, Gene W4SZ Art, Pick up any book that includes a discussion of Maxwell's Equations. One of the equations will be something like: div D = rho The common expression of Gauss' Law is something like: div E = rho / epsilon By definition: D = E * epsilon Therefore Gauss' Law is already included in all radiation and all antennas. Yes the law is every where. What am I suppose to be claiming so that we can get on subject. I don't want to be bombarded with irrelavent facts. You can perform any amount of mathematical manipulation you wish, including expressing these equations in integral rather than differential form. The integral form is commonly used when discussing the Gaussian "pillbox" in electrostatics. I agree and they are correct as far as they have ventured However, the physical conditions remain the same. yes when talking about electrostatics You have stated on many occasions that you understand this sort of vector manipulation, This sort? So am I to assume that you have found a reference to curl by Gauss specifying its use with respect to electro magnetic fields? Where is it So am I to assume that Gauss extended his law on statics to include electro magnetic fields? Where is that written? Did he also supply the rational used to arrive at that equation? where is it written? e.g., you throw curls around freely, so no further explanation should be necessary. You explain what you mean by freely I don't throw curl around freely but I don't ignor its presence either where did I throw curl around freely where it wasn't warrented and why was it not warranted? Gene you are showing that you are out of your depth, all hand waving but no facts. The above could prove me wrong if you have the facts.I have specifically asked for your facts at each point. If you have them by all means supply them so we can all applaud your hand at knoweledge. Art 73, Gene W4SZ- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |