Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 6th 07, 04:41 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,374
Default Measuring Antenna Efficiency

I should elaborate a little.

The average gain is the ratio of the total power in all directions at a
great distance (beyond the point where the surface wave has decayed to a
negligible value) to the power into the antenna from all the sources.
(There's a factor of two also involved when using a ground plane with
NEC but not with EZNEC.) So the average gain is the efficiency if you
consider ground reflection and the decay of the surface wave to be part
of the loss.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Roy Lewallen wrote:
Frank wrote:

Correct Owen. NEC shows 97.3% for free space, and 100 %,
as expected, with perfect conductors. Certainly the loss does
include absorption of the reflected rays. As mentioned before, in
previous threads, it is very tedious to determine what percentage
of the "Loss" is due to ground wave radiation. One of these
days I will write the code necessary to compute the actual
TRP including ground wave.


That capability is already built into NEC, as the average gain calculation.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

  #2   Report Post  
Old March 6th 07, 02:32 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 409
Default Measuring Antenna Efficiency


"Frank" wrote in message
news:_c3Hh.16918$lY6.10683@edtnps90...

"Owen Duffy" wrote in message
...
"Frank" wrote in news:f71Hh.16901$lY6.7593

.......
As an example consider a horizontal 75 m dipole, constructed of
#14 AWG copper, at various heights above an average ground.
The radiation efficiency, according to NEC, is shown below:

height 10 ft, efficiency 14%;
height 30 ft, efficiency 54%,
height 90 ft efficiency 82%

The above results do not include the ground wave, which
can be considered lost power. Ground absorption also increases
with proximity to the ground.


Frank,

What is the figure for free space? I suspect closer to 99%. If that is
the case, don't your figures include loss (or absorbption) in rays
reflected by the ground?

Owen


Correct Owen. NEC shows 97.3% for free space, and 100 %,
as expected, with perfect conductors. Certainly the loss does
include absorption of the reflected rays. As mentioned before, in
previous threads, it is very tedious to determine what percentage
of the "Loss" is due to ground wave radiation. One of these
days I will write the code necessary to compute the actual
TRP including ground wave.

Frank


Interesting. Thanks Frank.





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yagi efficiency art Antenna 117 October 5th 06 04:37 PM
Yagi efficiency Harold E. Johnson Antenna 0 September 26th 06 07:24 PM
measuring antenna resonance with an 8405a dansawyeror Antenna 16 December 8th 05 04:13 AM
High Efficiency Mobile HF Antenna? Rick Frazier Antenna 12 October 9th 04 09:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017