"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 06:48:18 -0500, "Mike Lucas"
wrote:


"art" wrote:

I would say you are close enough to say you are correct. Because you
chose a dipole which is in a state of equilibrium and thus particles
projected from the dipole cannot collide with other particles from
other parasitic radiators. Aren't you not basically refering to the
foundations of Poyntings vector which like Gauss is refering to an
item in equilibrium when subjected to a time variable of zero value ?
If the item is not in a state of equilibrium collision
of particles may well occur without a radiation field reaction thus
one cannot calculate the resultant field since energy transfer due to
particle collision prevents the return of particles to the mother
radiator.

I've been reading Art's posts for some time now, mostly for the
entertainment value. Some of the recent posts were starting to make
sense, and this was causing me some concern: that my bafflegab
filter in the computor (sic) had gone out. Well, the above quote was
a wakeup call... I don't have a clue what he's saying. Can someone
translate, please.

Equi Librium is a drug, that is too big to swallow, so you have to
crush it into particles on one mother of a radiator. If you try to
swallow it whole, you will get one massive field reaction (a buzz) in
a time variable of zero value (like really fast) which may induce
projectile vomiting.

Maybe.

If not, then we will have to Gauss again.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Now I know what my daughter means when she talks about the random kids.