On 8 Mar, 18:45, wrote:
art wrote:

a huge pile of rambling nonsense

Out of curiosity, are you drunk, on drugs, suffering from the early
stages of dementia, a troll, or just an idiot?

snip rambling nonsense

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Jim, Time will tell wether it is you or I. Either way you have lots of
company on your side. AS YET NOBODY BUT NOBODY HAS PROVED BY ANALYSIS
AS INCORRECT. sSo why not be a hero and prove to all that the gaussian
antenna as I have described and explained for many, many months
possibly a year is an impossibility. Or conversley explain how
computor programs cannot possibly react in a way I state,or conversley
explain to all why Art was in fact correct in that computor programs
can react as he states AND IN ADDITION he is correct in his analysis
of the connection between statics and
electro magnetics. Bear in mind that Roy was one of those who
ridicules the idea and thus the lemmings followed. Not one, not one of
those has provided any sort of technical analysis but continue to pile
on nonsense or twisting the events to suit their bluster. But remember
sooner or later the real truth will dribble out and the naysayers will
slink away, or stand with ,I thought, I misread, it isn't in the
books,all is known about antennas e.t.c.
Even if Americans refuse to acknoweledge the truth there is a whole
wide World that is listening and watching and will make their own
descisions as to whether to seek the truth, despite American scowls
and bluster to the contrary. Again, you can't stop the advance of
science just with bluster or piles of sand, sooner or later one has to
decide what is the truth otherwise they are doomed to fall behind. No
one has provided a scientific response to what I state, nor is any one
willing to prove to himself what happens when the computor program is
actually tested and what should be done about it. Why put yourself in
the midst of such company who feel that derision is a good enough
response to the advance of science?
Art XG