Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:33:46 +0000, Ian White GM3SEK
wrote: Quantum theory describes electromagnetic energy as being divided into a series of packets called photons, so (total energy in a stream of photons) = (number of photons/second) x (energy of individual photons). Energy is not expressed with a time in the denominator. The standard quantum theory expression for energy is eV - time is wholly absent as it should be. This also means that EM energy doesn't exist in pure sine-waves EM theory does not exclude the classic description of pure sine waves. This is not a neither/nor situation. - the waveform is actually built up in steps, very much like digitized audio. This appears to be the beginnings of a description about to fall off the edge. What waveform? This is a conceit of time. The step size is the energy content of one quantum. No, the step size as you describe is the potential difference of quantization, an engineering term, not a quantum mechanics term. It is quantisizing an amplitude to construct the wave in a time domain. Quanta is the complete wave in a frequency domain. The transform from one domain to the other is classic Fourier. His analysis revealed that one unique energy (a single frequency) can be decimated into many components (amplitudes over time). The transformation is fully reversible (many amplitudes over time turned back into one single frequency) without any information loss. Mixing the two as being one analysis, corrupts it. Time is not a factor in energy and cannot be drawn into its discussion through transforms that mix topics. The question is: are those steps noticeable enough to be important? For light and shorter wavelengths, the answer is often Yes. Quantum theory was developed to explain observations like some kinds of light being emitted in a series of sharp spectral lines, which cannot be explained by a wave-only theory. Instead, it has to be thought of as being built up of individual photons/quanta which can only have certain "allowed" energy levels. There is absolutely no distinction between "allowed" energy levels and resonance which allows only certain frequencies. Resonance has been historically correlated with circularity, and every instance you site above is found in the change of orbitals - circular, harmonic motion. A photon is emitted in the cM band when an electron orbiting a Hydrogen atom flips its magnetic pole. This event is vastly below the short wavelengths you describe by a million-fold. A good number of correspondents here are fully capable of detecting this event with commercial gear already suitable for the Ham market. They could have done it 50 years ago too. This is a quantum event, it is expressed with a classic quantum energy, and it is resolvable as being important (insofar as "importance" is a subjective, not quantitative quality). It is certainly noticeable and is not artificially constrained by scale. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian antenna aunwin | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian law and time varying fields | Antenna | |||
A gaussian style radiating antenna | Antenna | |||
FA: ELGENCO 602A GAUSSIAN NOISE GENERATOR- Weird! @$10 | Equipment |