Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:59:59 GMT, Dave
wrote: yes, referring to all 4 Maxwell equations you do have a 't' dependency. however, even equations 1.13 and 1.14 referred to by your quote have NO time dependency in them. the equations on the next page,1.15 and 1.16 have the time dependency that the 't' in your quote refers to. remember, those integrals are NOT integrals over time, they are over the surface or volume. As I stated before, this chapter deals with electrostatics so the time dependence has been dropped. However, the fact remains that Gauss's law is the integral form of the first Maxwell equation, which holds for an arbitrary space-time point. Unless you reject the first equation, namely div E(x,t) = 4 \pi \rho(x,t) or the divergence thereom, you have to accept the fact that \integral_S E(x,t).dA = 4 \pi \integral_V dV \rho(x,t) which is Gauss's theorem. This is my last post regarding this subject. --John |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian antenna aunwin | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian law and time varying fields | Antenna | |||
A gaussian style radiating antenna | Antenna | |||
FA: ELGENCO 602A GAUSSIAN NOISE GENERATOR- Weird! @$10 | Equipment |