On 22 Apr, 08:02, Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:06:53 GMT, "Dave" wrote:
it probably hasn't been because nobody has bothered to write a reviewable
paper on it...

Hi Dave,

As I've already pointed out, this was done a long time ago and is in
the library.

Richard you lie so often that are getting very fluent with your
imagination. I often laugh when you tried to suggest that you put the
Dr straight regarding mathematics. Also when you suggested that you
knew about gaussian antennas long ago but you are a bit confused about
whether you thought you launched the idea yourself or you saw
something written about it but with your flowery writing you have been
unable to communicate its actual origins. I also laugh at your attempt
to apply for a patent! Nothing like the patents written by Edison on
the back of a napkin. You wrote in your normal flowery language so the
examiner would be confused about what you were claiming, and like the
nose of pinochio your patent grew and grew and grew in size the
examiners sent it to Field and Stream thinking it applied in some way
to weed aplications.
Ofcourse it got back to the patent office and as you said it was to
big and volumous to fit into any enclosure the PTO had on hand and as
you said they put in on the floor where it gathered dust because the
examiner couldn't or didn't want to find it. Tell the group what that
patent number was so they can read it for themselves tho you never did
say if a patent was granted and whether the title was clear enough so
it could be placed into the correct category. Richard you are in a
imaginary world when you say you believe, think,know, that a
dissertation on Gaussian arrays has already been written when most
realise when reading your posts you have no idea what the concept is
about in the first place so you will never ever be able to recall the
underpinnings for what you are claiming credit for. So really it will
be no different to the many other things you have said or claimed
because your prose concealed all so succesfully. Richard you are the
Andy Cap of the antenna world and pretty good at it I might say.
Art






snip
Snip

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On 22 Apr 2007 14:19:49 -0700, art wrote:

Also when you suggested that you
knew about gaussian antennas long ago

Hi Art,

I bought a Goniometer at my first Ham auction in 1966. Only 41 years
ago, but it was only 50 years old then (the concept, not the
goniometer), and now the topic has been around for so long that most
have forgotten it like the sand that surrounds the Sphinx.

Can you explain how the Goniometer, the conceptual child of Bennetti
and Tosi?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC