Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Yuri Blanarovich" wrote in
: Global Scam of all times. Not even antenna optimizers or Gausian gizmos can do a thing about it. As soon as Algore got his Ossskar, God blew wave of cold to show him who is in charge :-) So let me get this straight, Yuri, A cold snap in your neighborhood means that Global warming is invalid? I always offer this challenge: A number of gaseous components naturally occurring in the atmosphere have an effect that tends to retain heat. These are collectively referred to as greenhouse gases. That paragraph is a fact. It has been experimentally proven. Through various methods, the amount of at least one of those gases has increased significantly since the beginning of the industrial age. That is a measurable fact. note: there have been some fairly dramatic increases in other gases that are much more "actice" in heat retention, like methane. Let's ignore them for the purposes of this argument. Give me a compelling and scientific reason why proven scientific facts are not having a measurable effect on the earth's temperature. Then invalidate the apparent measured effects that would tend to support the warming. I am willing to abandon the thought of global warming if someone can give me a real and non-political argument. Of course, that means no offhand remarks about Left wingers, commies, or the usual suspect trotted out as some kind of "proof" that satisfies only those who get their science news from AM radio talkshow hosts. From a right-winger who looks beyond the politics. (p.s. no one has done it yet) - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|