LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old March 10th 07, 07:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,374
Default Isolation of guy wires

Actually, you can't get a lot of reactance from ferrite cores at HF. You
can get a considerable amount of impedance, but for the ferrite types
which provide it, the impedance is largely resistive, not reactive. The
most common material, Fair-Rite type 43 and equivalents, has a Q of 1 (R
= X) at a frequency of a few MHz, and is increasingly resistive above
that. But even with the highest impedance materials, you'll likely need
quite a few cores with substantial cross section at each location.
Anyone interested in ferrite impedance properties can visit the
Fair-Rite web site to learn more.

A choke at a high-impedance point doesn't do much, since there's no
substantial current at that location to block. You should put the choke
about a quarter wavelength from there where the current is nominally
high. The presence of the choke can move the locations of high and low
voltage and current points, so you'll need a choke at least about every
quarter wavelength to make sure there's no point where substantial
current can occur.

Others have pointed out that ferrite chokes might be a viable way of
effecting RF isolation on conductors carrying low frequency AC, such as
power lines. But I maintain that it's not a good solution for guy wires,
which was the subject of the original posting.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Antonio Vernucci wrote:
It would require multiple beads at each point, and at multiple points.
While it could be made to work, it would be heavy and expensive.
That's why egg insulators or non-conductive guys are used instead.


While in a balun a reactance of say 1000 ohm would be more than adequate
for the purpose of avoiding radiation (or reception) by common-mode
currents, in the proposed application (guy-wires) a much higher
reactance would be required. As a matter of fact at the top of the
tower, where there is a voltage peak, the impedance is very high, and
the guy-wire insulator (either an egg or ferrite beads) should then show
a very high reactance value (probably in the region of tens of thousands
of ohm) not to disturb the antenna.

I never played with ferrite beads, but I have a rather strong feeling
that such high reactance values are hard to obtain at 3.5 MHz just using
beads.

73

Tony I0JX



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB Telos ISDN and isolation booth (Chicago) [email protected] Broadcasting 0 April 21st 05 07:37 PM
WTB Isolation Transformer Diane Swap 0 January 4th 05 02:19 AM
F.S. Isolation Transformer n.o.s. Kb2rev Boatanchors 0 January 21st 04 11:44 PM
isolation transformer Ken Luther Equipment 6 September 22nd 03 03:51 PM
isolation transformer Ken Luther Equipment 0 September 22nd 03 04:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017