| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually, you can't get a lot of reactance from ferrite cores at HF. You
can get a considerable amount of impedance, but for the ferrite types which provide it, the impedance is largely resistive, not reactive. The most common material, Fair-Rite type 43 and equivalents, has a Q of 1 (R = X) at a frequency of a few MHz, and is increasingly resistive above that. But even with the highest impedance materials, you'll likely need quite a few cores with substantial cross section at each location. Anyone interested in ferrite impedance properties can visit the Fair-Rite web site to learn more. A choke at a high-impedance point doesn't do much, since there's no substantial current at that location to block. You should put the choke about a quarter wavelength from there where the current is nominally high. The presence of the choke can move the locations of high and low voltage and current points, so you'll need a choke at least about every quarter wavelength to make sure there's no point where substantial current can occur. Others have pointed out that ferrite chokes might be a viable way of effecting RF isolation on conductors carrying low frequency AC, such as power lines. But I maintain that it's not a good solution for guy wires, which was the subject of the original posting. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Antonio Vernucci wrote: It would require multiple beads at each point, and at multiple points. While it could be made to work, it would be heavy and expensive. That's why egg insulators or non-conductive guys are used instead. While in a balun a reactance of say 1000 ohm would be more than adequate for the purpose of avoiding radiation (or reception) by common-mode currents, in the proposed application (guy-wires) a much higher reactance would be required. As a matter of fact at the top of the tower, where there is a voltage peak, the impedance is very high, and the guy-wire insulator (either an egg or ferrite beads) should then show a very high reactance value (probably in the region of tens of thousands of ohm) not to disturb the antenna. I never played with ferrite beads, but I have a rather strong feeling that such high reactance values are hard to obtain at 3.5 MHz just using beads. 73 Tony I0JX |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| WTB Telos ISDN and isolation booth (Chicago) | Broadcasting | |||
| WTB Isolation Transformer | Swap | |||
| F.S. Isolation Transformer n.o.s. | Boatanchors | |||
| isolation transformer | Equipment | |||
| isolation transformer | Equipment | |||