Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: If you think a standing wave is a "shortcut", how about showing the mathematical models that support your position? I already did, Gene, but here it is again: forward traveling wave + reverse traveling wave = standing wave just substitute the appropriate math symbols. There's a trig identity that corresponds to the above equation. Take away either the forward traveling wave or the reverse traveling wave and the standing wave ceases to exist. There's no valid mathematical model that supports the position that standing waves can exist with the two component waves. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Caculating VSWR from rho and rho from VSWR | Antenna | |||
Does it matter about packing? | Boatanchors | |||
VSWR Question | Antenna | |||
VSWR Fundamentals | CB | |||
WTB: V-UHF WATTMETER/ VSWR | Swap |