| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cecil Moore" wrote Plus they need to be linked to reality. Standing waves existing without the component forward and reverse traveling waves is divorced from reality. Neither you nor anyone else has been able to provide even one real-world example of such. Forward traveling wave + reflected traveling wave = standing wave What happens to the standing wave when you take away the reflected wave? Forward traveling wave + nothing = forward traveling wave i.e. there is no standing wave. So please tell us again how you can build a standing wave from a single traveling wave. ... so you can forget about bringing up all of your TV ghost arguments. That rug of yours under which you try to sweep all the reflected energy is going to explode one of these days. :-) -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com Which brings us back to the great loading coil dispute. In the resonant quarter wave monopole (say 80m), loaded with solenoid coil, about 2/3 up the radiator, we experience significant (about 40%) current drop at the top end of the coil. This is also demonstrated by bottom of the coil getting warmer or hot proportionately, indicating that we have standing wave circuit and some real current in the system, fortifying Cecil's argument. RF is flowing along the radiator, "seeing" high impedance tip at the end, being reflected, flowing back and being superimposed with the forward wave. Reality that W8JI and other "defenders" had hard time to swallow. In the case of traveling wave antenna, like Beverage, terminated with resistance, we can see the uniform current along the wire. Coil or slinky inserted in such system will show the same current along the coil (minus ohmic losses). There is real life proof about what Cecil is saying above. Relating to the standing wave circuit, I had question in my mind: how important is to control the resistance and consider it in standing wave antenna system. Example is that the current above the loading coil is appreciably smaller than at the base, hinting that you perhaps do not need low resistance (copper tubing vs. SS whip). But... if the standing wave is made of forward and reverse traveling waves, should not we be trying to keep the resistance low in the system? Or is it insignificant? My pet peeve tells me that it would gain significance in the multi element loaded arrays. Do the modeling programs capture that? They show slight increase of current at the bottom (few turns) of the coil (when loading inductance is properly modeled). Would that be due to the loss from that point on, when forward and reflected wave is "meeting" the losses to resistance and radiation and then with lesser amplitude superimposing with forward wave? Yuri, K3BU.us |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Caculating VSWR from rho and rho from VSWR | Antenna | |||
| Does it matter about packing? | Boatanchors | |||
| VSWR Question | Antenna | |||
| VSWR Fundamentals | CB | |||
| WTB: V-UHF WATTMETER/ VSWR | Swap | |||