Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote ...That's simply not true. When the load is connected directly to the source, incident power is often still rejected, it just doesn't have very far to "bounce". And since it is internal to the source, the "bouncing" is difficult if not impossible to quantitize. etc Does the lack of a technical response to Cecil's post (so far) mean that his analysis and conclusions are understood and accepted? The "eliminate the transmission line" sword cuts both ways. If the source cannot tell the difference between driving a one wavelength transmission line and driving a lumped circuit load directly, it follows that the load cannot tell if it is being driven by a one-wavelength transmission line or being driven directly by a source. The incident signal looks the same in either case and the load rejects (reflects) the same amount of forward power either way. Except for the energy stored in the one- wavelength transmission line, conditions are the same in either case. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Caculating VSWR from rho and rho from VSWR | Antenna | |||
Does it matter about packing? | Boatanchors | |||
VSWR Question | Antenna | |||
VSWR Fundamentals | CB | |||
WTB: V-UHF WATTMETER/ VSWR | Swap |