|
Efficiency
On 15 Mar, 17:35, John Smith I wrote:
Dave wrote: ... what prevents me from drawing an imaginary Gaussian boundary around my yagi? No one to enforce the borders? And, then "illegals" creep in? grin JS --http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com Did you hear that mexican illegals are not arrested if they have less than 50 lbs of weed when they cross the border? Apparently they are growing it on such a wide scale in the National parks of the U.S. it is uneconomical to bring in such small amounts. For American citizens 3 gramms is enough to put you inside. Go figure Mexican Nationals/drivers in the U.S. also don't need amateur licenses during the 6 month pilot plan I think that if less than 50 lbs can be brought in without penalty then all those now in prison should be let out to feed themselves. Art |
Efficiency
On 15 Mar, 17:35, John Smith I wrote:
Dave wrote: ... what prevents me from drawing an imaginary Gaussian boundary around my yagi? No one to enforce the borders? And, then "illegals" creep in? grin JS --http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com Did you know that anybody can visit the U.S. on holiday can stay for ever like mexicans. The U.S. government is too broke to deport them or even arrest them. Polish people are not allowed a visa to visit Chicago now for any reason as the Feds say they all just stay. Now Chicago is a sanctuary city for Mexicans and the police protect them from the Feds. Illinois expects 30,000 new arrivals from Mexico this year and the buses are looking to accept pesos in the near future.When I came to the U.S. they gave me a green card but during the time I was required to carry it nobody asked to have a look at it, that is why Mexicans are willing to carry forgeries as everybody has forgotten what they look like. Our local hospitals has had record admittances last year as illegal immigrants are having anchor babies as soon as they can so we have to build a new school every year to accommodate them. Word is in Europe that the U.S, does not welcome Caucasians so few are even visiting on holiday from Western Europe. The message that you are either with us or you are against us is sure having an effect in Western Europe, I wonder if it will spread to ham radio. Art Art |
Efficiency
art wrote:
On 15 Mar, 17:35, John Smith I wrote: Dave wrote: ... what prevents me from drawing an imaginary Gaussian boundary around my yagi? No one to enforce the borders? And, then "illegals" creep in? grin JS --http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com Did you know that anybody can visit the U.S. on holiday can stay for ever like mexicans. The U.S. government is too broke to deport them or even arrest them. Polish people are not allowed a visa to visit Chicago now for any reason as the Feds say they all just stay. Now Chicago is a sanctuary city for Mexicans and the police protect them from the Feds. Illinois expects 30,000 new arrivals from Mexico this year and the buses are looking to accept pesos in the near future.When I came to the U.S. they gave me a green card but during the time I was required to carry it nobody asked to have a look at it, that is why Mexicans are willing to carry forgeries as everybody has forgotten what they look like. Our local hospitals has had record admittances last year as illegal immigrants are having anchor babies as soon as they can so we have to build a new school every year to accommodate them. Word is in Europe that the U.S, does not welcome Caucasians so few are even visiting on holiday from Western Europe. The message that you are either with us or you are against us is sure having an effect in Western Europe, I wonder if it will spread to ham radio. Art Art Yes, it is a nightmare, I have heard at some hospitals in so. calif. that the birth rate in some hospitals is 80% illegal alien children. If the tax payers are so free with their money, maybe they would like to pay for my grand childrens' children to be born? Wonder if anyone notices it is driving medical costs SKY HIGH??? Hey, it never hurts to ask! ROFLOL JS -- http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com |
Efficiency
On 15 Mar, 18:45, John Smith I wrote:
art wrote: On 15 Mar, 17:35, John Smith I wrote: Dave wrote: ... what prevents me from drawing an imaginary Gaussian boundary around my yagi? No one to enforce the borders? And, then "illegals" creep in? grin JS --http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com Did you know that anybody can visit the U.S. on holiday can stay for ever like mexicans. The U.S. government is too broke to deport them or even arrest them. Polish people are not allowed a visa to visit Chicago now for any reason as the Feds say they all just stay. Now Chicago is a sanctuary city for Mexicans and the police protect them from the Feds. Illinois expects 30,000 new arrivals from Mexico this year and the buses are looking to accept pesos in the near future.When I came to the U.S. they gave me a green card but during the time I was required to carry it nobody asked to have a look at it, that is why Mexicans are willing to carry forgeries as everybody has forgotten what they look like. Our local hospitals has had record admittances last year as illegal immigrants are having anchor babies as soon as they can so we have to build a new school every year to accommodate them. Word is in Europe that the U.S, does not welcome Caucasians so few are even visiting on holiday from Western Europe. The message that you are either with us or you are against us is sure having an effect in Western Europe, I wonder if it will spread to ham radio. Art Art Yes, it is a nightmare, I have heard at some hospitals in so. calif. that the birth rate in some hospitals is 80% illegal alien children. If the tax payers are so free with their money, maybe they would like to pay for my grand childrens' children to be born? Wonder if anyone notices it is driving medical costs SKY HIGH??? Hey, it never hurts to ask! ROFLOL JS --http://assemblywizard.tekcities.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well the olympics are being held either in Chicago or Los Angeles which should slow things down a bit. Mexico is not sending any teams to compete as they say that all that can run, jump or swim are already here Art |
Efficiency
On Mar 15, 8:09 pm, "art" wrote:
On 15 Mar, 17:02, "JIMMIE" wrote: On Mar 15, 7:12 pm, "art" wrote: On 15 Mar, 15:29, "Dave" wrote: "art" wrote in message roups.com... On 15 Mar, 14:47, "Dave" wrote: "art" wrote in message groups.com... It is oftimes said that parasitic elements of a yagi absorb radiatiation and then reradiate half of what it received. Is this meaning that it only absorbs half of the radiation applied in its direction and where it then reradiates 100% of its radiation? It apears to be a simple question depending how one looks at it in terms of efficiency which could mean anything. Now in my unreleased Gaussian antenna array there is no interaction with respect to radiation as radiation cannot occur outside until the enclosed border is breached. On the face of it one then can assume that a yagi is not really efficient depending how one uses terms that have a special definition because of absorbed radiation. Thoughts! Auguments!. Trashing, or what ever trips your trigger. Just when you thought that Gaussian arrays would go away a thing like this comes along, go figure. ( Don't forget Pointings vector and what it implies.grin) Art what prevents me from drawing an imaginary Gaussian boundary around my yagi?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - A yagi cannot be in equilibrium because of parasitic elements. A simple dipole can be in equilibrium and can be placed inside an arbitary border. Art ok, take each parasitic element on the yagi, break it in the middle to turn it into a 'dipole', add a voltage source set at 0v to drive it. now draw your imaginary boundary. i have satisfied your requirements, now why is my multi-dipole array not a gaussian array by your definition??- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Then your definitionor or my definition is incorrect. Remember at the cessation of time all movement of flux stops for the Gaussian logic to be sustained. I would venture that if the "Q" of the resident dipoles were varied then varience in polarity continues the movement of flux after the cessacition of time. Art- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Art said "Remember at the cessation of time all movement of flux stops. When is this going to happen. If it is anytime soon I need to seriously re-evaluate my retirement plans.((:))== Jimmie- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Jimmie you can't consider retirement if you are already brain dead Art- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ooh, name calling, well how do you get time to stop? this is the seond time you have mentioned it so I know it is not a typo. |
Efficiency
"art" wrote in message ups.com... On 15 Mar, 15:29, "Dave" wrote: "art" wrote in message oups.com... On 15 Mar, 14:47, "Dave" wrote: "art" wrote in message groups.com... It is oftimes said that parasitic elements of a yagi absorb radiatiation and then reradiate half of what it received. Is this meaning that it only absorbs half of the radiation applied in its direction and where it then reradiates 100% of its radiation? It apears to be a simple question depending how one looks at it in terms of efficiency which could mean anything. Now in my unreleased Gaussian antenna array there is no interaction with respect to radiation as radiation cannot occur outside until the enclosed border is breached. On the face of it one then can assume that a yagi is not really efficient depending how one uses terms that have a special definition because of absorbed radiation. Thoughts! Auguments!. Trashing, or what ever trips your trigger. Just when you thought that Gaussian arrays would go away a thing like this comes along, go figure. ( Don't forget Pointings vector and what it implies.grin) Art what prevents me from drawing an imaginary Gaussian boundary around my yagi?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - A yagi cannot be in equilibrium because of parasitic elements. A simple dipole can be in equilibrium and can be placed inside an arbitary border. Art ok, take each parasitic element on the yagi, break it in the middle to turn it into a 'dipole', add a voltage source set at 0v to drive it. now draw your imaginary boundary. i have satisfied your requirements, now why is my multi-dipole array not a gaussian array by your definition??- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - David, You are obviously an immigrant to the U.K., Nigeria perhaps! I see you have made over 116,000 posts just on usenet and that is just counting one server, all in the search of a fight and goodness knows how many aliases you have used every day. How about providing one of your many amateur calls? has it been that many posts? i'll bet you just searched for the alias i use on here, which is a common anti-spam alias used by many posters. i use only the one alias, though i did just recently switch isp's so the posting server has changed, oh and i do occasionally post via news.microsoft.com for some of their software development groups. if you really wanted to find out who i was you would have found it already... its right there if you really want it. every header (at least from this isp) has the real identity in it. |
Efficiency
On 16 Mar, 14:10, "Dave" wrote:
"art" wrote in message ups.com... On 15 Mar, 15:29, "Dave" wrote: "art" wrote in message groups.com... On 15 Mar, 14:47, "Dave" wrote: "art" wrote in message groups.com... It is oftimes said that parasitic elements of a yagi absorb radiatiation and then reradiate half of what it received. Is this meaning that it only absorbs half of the radiation applied in its direction and where it then reradiates 100% of its radiation? It apears to be a simple question depending how one looks at it in terms of efficiency which could mean anything. Now in my unreleased Gaussian antenna array there is no interaction with respect to radiation as radiation cannot occur outside until the enclosed border is breached. On the face of it one then can assume that a yagi is not really efficient depending how one uses terms that have a special definition because of absorbed radiation. Thoughts! Auguments!. Trashing, or what ever trips your trigger. Just when you thought that Gaussian arrays would go away a thing like this comes along, go figure. ( Don't forget Pointings vector and what it implies.grin) Art what prevents me from drawing an imaginary Gaussian boundary around my yagi?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - A yagi cannot be in equilibrium because of parasitic elements. A simple dipole can be in equilibrium and can be placed inside an arbitary border. Art ok, take each parasitic element on the yagi, break it in the middle to turn it into a 'dipole', add a voltage source set at 0v to drive it. now draw your imaginary boundary. i have satisfied your requirements, now why is my multi-dipole array not a gaussian array by your definition??- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - David, You are obviously an immigrant to the U.K., Nigeria perhaps! I see you have made over 116,000 posts just on usenet and that is just counting one server, all in the search of a fight and goodness knows how many aliases you have used every day. How about providing one of your many amateur calls? has it been that many posts? i'll bet you just searched for the alias i use on here, which is a common anti-spam alias used by many posters. i use only the one alias, though i did just recently switch isp's so the posting server has changed, oh and i do occasionally post via news.microsoft.com for some of their software development groups. if you really wanted to find out who i was you would have found it already... its right there if you really want it. every header (at least from this isp) has the real identity in it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I was putting you about 100 to 140 miles North by Northwest of London. I suppose that would be towards the Derby area . |
Efficiency
On 16 Mar 2007 14:41:48 -0700, "art" wrote:
if you really wanted to find out who i was you would have found it already... its right there if you really want it. every header (at least from this isp) has the real identity in it. I was putting you about 100 to 140 miles North by Northwest of London. I suppose that would be towards the Derby area . Hi Art, Brooklyn. Not even close if you said New London, Conneticut. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com