![]() |
|
Soldering and Antennas
Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in
an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? I am disregarding the special case of magnetic loops where RsubA must be kept low. I am also disregarding the matter of mechanical integrity. In my case I am looking at soldering radials to a piece of copper wire at the base of an antenna, and also adding a bit of length to the radiating element. What about the use of wire nuts to join wires? The antenna is an HF marconi in an inverted-L configuration. Thanks for any advice on the matter. Irv VE6BP -- -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
Soldering and Antennas
"Irv Finkleman" wrote in message ... Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? Irv I'd think you'd want a solid mechanical connection.. Even disregarding mechanical issues, a lightning discharge would blow apart a soldered connection. Have you considered using electricians' split bolt type connectors to make the splices? Pete |
Soldering and Antennas
Irv Finkleman wrote in :
Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? Are you really asking are conductors other than copper (eg solder) are suitable for antennas? I think you know the answer to that. I am disregarding the special case of magnetic loops where RsubA must be kept low. I am also disregarding the matter of mechanical integrity. In my case I am looking at soldering radials to a piece of copper wire at the base of an antenna, and also adding a bit of length to the radiating element. I note you excluded mechanical integrity, nevertheless... I suggest you not depend solely on solder for retention of wires. One day, your antenna conductors might be called upon to carry high current (eg lightning), and it might be better if the solder didn't just melt and allow the wires to fall apart. What about the use of wire nuts to join wires? In some ways, you might as well just twist the wires together. Some wire nuts come with a water+air exclusing medium (grease), but otherwise they are not a lot different to twisting the wires together except they may introduce another metal (in the case of the ones with a metallic spring inside) to the contact mix. Twisting wires together might be more successfull for power applications where there is sufficient voltage to overcome an oxide layer, for RF receive I would use solder or terminals that apply considerable pressure to the joined wires. Remember that oxided wire connections can cause havoc with receivers and transmitters, the non-linear joint causing harmonic generation and mixing. Owen |
Soldering and Antennas
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:12:03 GMT, Irv Finkleman
wrote: Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? Hi Irv, In the Navy, I taught (per the syllabus) that you made a gas-tight electrical connection between conductors and sealed it with solder. Solder was not expected to maintain the electrical or mechanical connection. An example would be a Western Union Splice, then flowed with solder. I am disregarding the special case of magnetic loops where RsubA must be kept low. I am also disregarding the matter of mechanical integrity. That pretty much conforms to what I say above. However, having said that, Lead, Tin and other alloys are usually good conductors when used in suitable quantity (or with sufficient surface area). There is nothing wrong with a soldered joint in a magnetic loop, although a soldered loop can easily be done poorly. There are other issues of weathering of solder, and galvanic reactions. This argues sealing the solder with rubber or synthetic coating, and/or examining the metals involved. This is usually a rare issue to be concerned about. In my case I am looking at soldering radials to a piece of copper wire at the base of an antenna, and also adding a bit of length to the radiating element. What about the use of wire nuts to join wires? They enforce the gas-tight connection and preserve the seal of that interface through spring force, but usually in a dry environment (I suppose you can find weather proof versions). The antenna is an HF marconi in an inverted-L configuration. Thanks for any advice on the matter. Irv VE6BP 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Soldering and Antennas
Thanks Pete -- I'm not really concerned about mechanical connection
as there will be no physical strain. Yes! I am definitely considering 'split bolt' (I call them wire nuts -- not sure where I got the expression). Uncle Peter wrote: "Irv Finkleman" wrote in message ... Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? Irv I'd think you'd want a solid mechanical connection.. Even disregarding mechanical issues, a lightning discharge would blow apart a soldered connection. Have you considered using electricians' split bolt type connectors to make the splices? Pete -- -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
Soldering and Antennas
Owen Duffy wrote: Irv Finkleman wrote in : Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? Are you really asking are conductors other than copper (eg solder) are suitable for antennas? I think you know the answer to that. No -- everything will be copper to copper. I note you excluded mechanical integrity, nevertheless... I suggest you not depend solely on solder for retention of wires. One day, your antenna conductors might be called upon to carry high current (eg lightning), and it might be better if the solder didn't just melt and allow the wires to fall apart. There will be no mechanical strain on the wires. They will be connected to a common ring of copper surrounding the base of the connected. In some ways, you might as well just twist the wires together. Some wire nuts come with a water+air exclusing medium (grease), but otherwise they are not a lot different to twisting the wires together except they may introduce another metal (in the case of the ones with a metallic spring inside) to the contact mix. Twisting wires together might be more successfull for power applications where there is sufficient voltage to overcome an oxide layer, for RF receive I would use solder or terminals that apply considerable pressure to the joined wires. This is for a radial system, and I basically operate QRP or in a tough fight might run 50w! I'll will consider a water/air excluding grease if I use wire nuts - thanks for the tip! Remember that oxided wire connections can cause havoc with receivers and transmitters, the non-linear joint causing harmonic generation and mixing. Oh yeah! Been there before! :-) Owen -- -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
Soldering and Antennas
Richard Clark wrote: On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:12:03 GMT, Irv Finkleman wrote: Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? Hi Irv, In the Navy, I taught (per the syllabus) that you made a gas-tight electrical connection between conductors and sealed it with solder. Solder was not expected to maintain the electrical or mechanical connection. An example would be a Western Union Splice, then flowed with solder. Yep! The good old 'Western Union Splice' one of the first things I learned way back when. I am disregarding the special case of magnetic loops where RsubA must be kept low. I am also disregarding the matter of mechanical integrity. That pretty much conforms to what I say above. However, having said that, Lead, Tin and other alloys are usually good conductors when used in suitable quantity (or with sufficient surface area). There is nothing wrong with a soldered joint in a magnetic loop, although a soldered loop can easily be done poorly. I must have had a Senior's moment. I was thinking of a mechanical joint rather than a soldered one. In a magloop, which is one of the projects I'm working on now, I plan to use copper and silver-solder for sure. There are other issues of weathering of solder, and galvanic reactions. This argues sealing the solder with rubber or synthetic coating, and/or examining the metals involved. This is usually a rare issue to be concerned about. As per Owen's post I will consider a sealant or protection of some sort. In any event, the major effort is installing radials which will be soldered to a ring of copper wire around the base of the antenna -- it will be readily accessible for inspection and repair if required. I don't want to have to to that too often though -- and I sure as heck don't want to run out and dig through the snow when it's 30 below! :-) In my case I am looking at soldering radials to a piece of copper wire at the base of an antenna, and also adding a bit of length to the radiating element. What about the use of wire nuts to join wires? They enforce the gas-tight connection and preserve the seal of that interface through spring force, but usually in a dry environment (I suppose you can find weather proof versions). Wire nuts with suitable protective coating after connection may just be the easiest way to go. I only want to put out 8 radials. As for the radiating element, it doesn't have a lot of strain on it either, but I think for temporary testing I'll just use a quick twist of the wire and solder it until I find the length I want -- then I'll do a Western Union bit with just a few turns, then solder flood it. It is #12 and shouldn't be a problem to twist in a fancy manner. Thanks for the ideas. Irv The antenna is an HF marconi in an inverted-L configuration. Thanks for any advice on the matter. Irv VE6BP 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC -- -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
Soldering and Antennas
Irv Finkleman wrote in :
Thanks Pete -- I'm not really concerned about mechanical connection as there will be no physical strain. Yes! I am definitely considering 'split bolt' (I call them wire nuts -- not sure where I got the expression). Here is a picture of what most of us understand to be wire nuts: http://cableorganizer.com/wire-connectors/ Quite a different thing to split bolt line taps. http://www.vk1od.net/post/post04.jpg shows a split bolt on the earth electrode. My comments about wire nuts were about wire nuts as most of us understand. I would not use wire nuts for your earth system. Split bolt connectors are fine for your purpose. Owen |
Soldering and Antennas
"Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... Here is a picture of what most of us understand to be wire nuts: http://cableorganizer.com/wire-connectors/ Quite a different thing to split bolt line taps. http://www.vk1od.net/post/post04.jpg shows a split bolt on the earth electrode. Split bolt electrical connectors look like this Stateside: http://ebusiness.ilsco.com/webapp/wc...1&categoryId=1 Used a lot for electrical connections to utility power transformers, etc. Pete |
Soldering and Antennas
"Uncle Peter" wrote in
: "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... Here is a picture of what most of us understand to be wire nuts: http://cableorganizer.com/wire-connectors/ Quite a different thing to split bolt line taps. http://www.vk1od.net/post/post04.jpg shows a split bolt on the earth electrode. Split bolt electrical connectors look like this Stateside: http://ebusiness.ilsco.com/webapp/wc...goryDisplay?st oreId=10001&langId=-1&catalogId=1&categoryId=1 Used a lot for electrical connections to utility power transformers, etc. Yes Pete, same as I showed, but better detail in your pic. Insulating covers are also available which sort of hides the internals. Owen |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:55 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com