Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in
an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? I am disregarding the special case of magnetic loops where RsubA must be kept low. I am also disregarding the matter of mechanical integrity. In my case I am looking at soldering radials to a piece of copper wire at the base of an antenna, and also adding a bit of length to the radiating element. What about the use of wire nuts to join wires? The antenna is an HF marconi in an inverted-L configuration. Thanks for any advice on the matter. Irv VE6BP -- -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Irv Finkleman" wrote in message ... Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? Irv I'd think you'd want a solid mechanical connection.. Even disregarding mechanical issues, a lightning discharge would blow apart a soldered connection. Have you considered using electricians' split bolt type connectors to make the splices? Pete |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Pete -- I'm not really concerned about mechanical connection
as there will be no physical strain. Yes! I am definitely considering 'split bolt' (I call them wire nuts -- not sure where I got the expression). Uncle Peter wrote: "Irv Finkleman" wrote in message ... Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? Irv I'd think you'd want a solid mechanical connection.. Even disregarding mechanical issues, a lightning discharge would blow apart a soldered connection. Have you considered using electricians' split bolt type connectors to make the splices? Pete -- -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Irv Finkleman wrote in :
Thanks Pete -- I'm not really concerned about mechanical connection as there will be no physical strain. Yes! I am definitely considering 'split bolt' (I call them wire nuts -- not sure where I got the expression). Here is a picture of what most of us understand to be wire nuts: http://cableorganizer.com/wire-connectors/ Quite a different thing to split bolt line taps. http://www.vk1od.net/post/post04.jpg shows a split bolt on the earth electrode. My comments about wire nuts were about wire nuts as most of us understand. I would not use wire nuts for your earth system. Split bolt connectors are fine for your purpose. Owen |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... Here is a picture of what most of us understand to be wire nuts: http://cableorganizer.com/wire-connectors/ Quite a different thing to split bolt line taps. http://www.vk1od.net/post/post04.jpg shows a split bolt on the earth electrode. Split bolt electrical connectors look like this Stateside: http://ebusiness.ilsco.com/webapp/wc...1&categoryId=1 Used a lot for electrical connections to utility power transformers, etc. Pete |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Uncle Peter" wrote in
: "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... Here is a picture of what most of us understand to be wire nuts: http://cableorganizer.com/wire-connectors/ Quite a different thing to split bolt line taps. http://www.vk1od.net/post/post04.jpg shows a split bolt on the earth electrode. Split bolt electrical connectors look like this Stateside: http://ebusiness.ilsco.com/webapp/wc...goryDisplay?st oreId=10001&langId=-1&catalogId=1&categoryId=1 Used a lot for electrical connections to utility power transformers, etc. Yes Pete, same as I showed, but better detail in your pic. Insulating covers are also available which sort of hides the internals. Owen |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Owen Duffy wrote: My comments about wire nuts were about wire nuts as most of us understand. I would not use wire nuts for your earth system. Split bolt connectors are fine for your purpose. Owen Thanks for the learnin' sir! Now I know, and I wouldn't use wire nuts either! I'm even leery about them in my house wiring! The split-bolt connector is what I had in mind. Thanks again Irv VE6BP -- -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 11:22 pm, Irv Finkleman wrote:
Owen Duffy wrote: My comments about wire nuts were about wire nuts as most of us understand. I would not use wire nuts for your earth system. Split bolt connectors are fine for your purpose. Owen Thanks for the learnin' sir! Now I know, and I wouldn't use wire nuts either! I'm even leery about them in my house wiring! The split-bolt connector is what I had in mind. Thanks again Irv VE6BP -- -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage athttp://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html Visit my Baby Sofia website athttp://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm Visit my OLDTIMERS website athttp://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada 16 guage and larger I tend to crimp, bolt, ect. smaller I solder. Jimmie |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Irv Finkleman wrote in :
Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? Are you really asking are conductors other than copper (eg solder) are suitable for antennas? I think you know the answer to that. I am disregarding the special case of magnetic loops where RsubA must be kept low. I am also disregarding the matter of mechanical integrity. In my case I am looking at soldering radials to a piece of copper wire at the base of an antenna, and also adding a bit of length to the radiating element. I note you excluded mechanical integrity, nevertheless... I suggest you not depend solely on solder for retention of wires. One day, your antenna conductors might be called upon to carry high current (eg lightning), and it might be better if the solder didn't just melt and allow the wires to fall apart. What about the use of wire nuts to join wires? In some ways, you might as well just twist the wires together. Some wire nuts come with a water+air exclusing medium (grease), but otherwise they are not a lot different to twisting the wires together except they may introduce another metal (in the case of the ones with a metallic spring inside) to the contact mix. Twisting wires together might be more successfull for power applications where there is sufficient voltage to overcome an oxide layer, for RF receive I would use solder or terminals that apply considerable pressure to the joined wires. Remember that oxided wire connections can cause havoc with receivers and transmitters, the non-linear joint causing harmonic generation and mixing. Owen |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Owen Duffy wrote: Irv Finkleman wrote in : Is a copper to copper contact always necessary in an antenna or does solder provide the necessary continuity when joining wire? Are you really asking are conductors other than copper (eg solder) are suitable for antennas? I think you know the answer to that. No -- everything will be copper to copper. I note you excluded mechanical integrity, nevertheless... I suggest you not depend solely on solder for retention of wires. One day, your antenna conductors might be called upon to carry high current (eg lightning), and it might be better if the solder didn't just melt and allow the wires to fall apart. There will be no mechanical strain on the wires. They will be connected to a common ring of copper surrounding the base of the connected. In some ways, you might as well just twist the wires together. Some wire nuts come with a water+air exclusing medium (grease), but otherwise they are not a lot different to twisting the wires together except they may introduce another metal (in the case of the ones with a metallic spring inside) to the contact mix. Twisting wires together might be more successfull for power applications where there is sufficient voltage to overcome an oxide layer, for RF receive I would use solder or terminals that apply considerable pressure to the joined wires. This is for a radial system, and I basically operate QRP or in a tough fight might run 50w! I'll will consider a water/air excluding grease if I use wire nuts - thanks for the tip! Remember that oxided wire connections can cause havoc with receivers and transmitters, the non-linear joint causing harmonic generation and mixing. Oh yeah! Been there before! :-) Owen -- -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Soldering Suprise | Homebrew | |||
Soldering Suprise | General | |||
Soldering Suprise | Policy | |||
soldering with a lighter | Homebrew | |||
soldering with a lighter | Homebrew |