Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:45:48 -0700, dansawyeror
wrote: It would seem a short might reduce some end capacitive effects when compared with an open circuit. However it would not help in the case of 'minor' frequency dependent changes in coax inductance. Hi Dan, A short "might reduce some?" That is rather an understatement. "It would not help... 'minor' changes?" That is even worse. Trying a short in place of an open would have taken less time, and proven these two statements are wrong. A short is also an excellent way to measure Ohmic loss in the cable. If you read your user's manual for your vector network analyzer (assuming it has one), you would find that a short is the preferred method. Also, for vector network analyzers that do not have built in correction, it is also expected you repeat the measurement with a Zc load. Then, and only then do you proceed to doing it with an open (which will reveal the extent of fringing). I wouldn't do an open anyway. Instead, I would measure a load constructed to mimic the measurable (you must have some idea what it is you are going to be measuring, don't you?) and put it in a shielded enclosure. Then move this text fixture to the vector network analyzer and repeat to see the effects of the line. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NEC 4.1 Anomaly | Antenna | |||
measurement error or bad coax?? | Antenna | |||
Gain measurement | Antenna | |||
Radio Reloj, Cuba-Anomaly | Shortwave | |||
Crystal Q measurement | Homebrew |