Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an old freind wrote:
... where is violence advocated? well MD claims that in asking what problems see with the fact you can pass the written test while missing all the rules and reg question is advocating no change at all Hey, we knew that it would be nothing but a group to amuse "at large." They epitomize wacko leftist-ideas, ya' suppose they are all closet-gay-democrats? ![]() Regards, JS |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "an old freind" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 16, 6:07 pm, John Smith I wrote: THE POST I WAS RESPONDING TO, AND MY POST IN RESPONSE: |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Cecil Moore wrote: ... Legally, it is not a contract unless you agree to it. What would happen if you simply crossed out the antenna restrictions clause before signing the contract? -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com Wouldn't ya' rather stab the person who drafted it with a pen? evil grin Regards, JS |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| END OF MY RESPONSE POST REASON WHY RRAM COULD NOT MORALLY/ETHICALLY ALLOW SUCH POST: |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Borderline inappropriate (advocacy of violence, even if joking, and not much more). - K3FU where is violence advocated? well MD claims that in asking what problems see with the fact you can pass the written test while missing all the rules and reg question is advocating no change at all Of course, conversely, had somebody said, "Wouldn't ya' rather stab Mark with a pen? " you can bet your Bagels Mark would have whined and cried that somebody was threatening his life. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 6:44�pm, "an old friend" wrote:
On Mar 16, 6:39 pm, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: "an old freind" wrote in ooglegroups.com... On Mar 16, 6:07 pm, John Smith I wrote: THE POST I WAS RESPONDING TO, AND MY POST IN RESPONSE: |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Cecil Moore wrote: * ... * Legally, it is not a contract unless you agree to it. * What would happen if you simply crossed out the antenna * restrictions clause before signing the contract? * -- * 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com Wouldn't ya' rather stab the person who drafted it with a pen? *evil grin Regards, JS |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| END OF MY RESPONSE POST REASON WHY RRAM COULD NOT MORALLY/ETHICALLY ALLOW SUCH POST: |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * Borderline inappropriate (advocacy of violence, even if joking, and not much more). - K3FU where is violence advocated? well MD claims that in asking what problems see with the fact you can pass the written test while missing all the rules and reg question *is advocating no change at all Of course, conversely, had somebody said, "Wouldn't ya' rather stab Mark with a pen? " you can bet your Bagels Mark would have whined and cried that somebody was threatening his life well that is more derect but you still lose other than you acidently undid Mike eforts at thread jacking it was just another of your worthless posts- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Morkie, will you learn how to use a spell checker. Your butcher the English language worse than a turkish cab driver. Dloyd http://www.markmorgansucks.blogspot.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 9:15?pm, wrote:
no stlaking of mike in my refusaul still no stlaking by my WTF??? LOL, my niece's two year old can spell better than you. Dloyd http://www.markmorgansucks.blogspot.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On 16 Mar 2007 18:25:39 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote: On Mar 16, 9:15?pm, wrote: no stlaking of mike in my refusaul still no stlaking by my WTF??? still nothing of the stalking you alege occoured it exists only in your dreams woger http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Stalking exists only in your dreams, Mark. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:41:34 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message .. . On 16 Mar 2007 18:25:39 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote: On Mar 16, 9:15?pm, wrote: no stlaking of mike in my refusaul still no stlaking by my WTF??? still nothing of the stalking you alege occoured it exists only in your dreams woger http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Stalking exists only in your dreams, Mark. hardly woger but you are a stalker so you don't reconize it as a crime To quote you just a week ago: not stlaking just garden variety jerking you around it does not rise to stalking till somebody makes a threat of violence so not quite Get your home-brewed "definitions" straight, Mark. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:00:20 -0500, "Not Marque" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message .. . On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:41:34 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: Stalking exists only in your dreams, Mark. hardly woger but you are a stalker so you don't reconize it as a crime To quote you just a week ago: not stlaking just garden variety jerking you around it does not rise to stalking till somebody makes a threat of violence so not quite your point Get your home-brewed "definitions" straight, Mark. I do you don't bother to pay attention If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jesus wrote:
wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:00:20 -0500, "Not Marque" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:41:34 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: Stalking exists only in your dreams, Mark. hardly woger but you are a stalker so you don't reconize it as a crime To quote you just a week ago: not stlaking just garden variety jerking you around it does not rise to stalking till somebody makes a threat of violence so not quite your point Get your home-brewed "definitions" straight, Mark. I do you don't bother to pay attention If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. Well, it might say that in the bible alright, however, I can guarantee the "feeling" won't be good for a real man ... and, their may indeed be consequences to be paid elsewhere ... "youse' pays your money, youse' take your chances"--has been told me by wise men ... JS |