Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
Ah, but that is USENET! Yep, Love it or leave it. :-) No one has demonstrated that using equivalent impedances etc is not a valid analysis of the steady state behaviour. Negative assertions are usually impossible to prove. The onus of proof is upon the ones who assert that reflected waves cease to exist during steady-state. The distributed network reflection model has yielded valid results for a century or so. Ramo and Whinnery go so far as to talk about the forward power flow vector and the reflected power flow vector. People trying to discredit that model just haven't accomplished their goal. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The power explanation | Antenna | |||
again a few words of explanation | General | |||
again a few words of explanation | Policy | |||
Explanation wanted | Antenna | |||
New ham needing explanation on radios | General |