| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Keith Dysart wrote:
I have yet to question the reflection of EM radiation, just the existence of "reverse power" in transmission lines. Then you are certainly engaging in the proverbial Red Herring. A simple example that I can never make add up is a 50 Watt generator with a 50 ohm output impedance, driving a 50 ohm line which is open at the end. Using the "reverse power" explanation, 50 W of "forward power" from the generator is reflected at the open end, providing 50 W of "reverse power". Since the generator is matched to the line there is no reflection when this "reverse power" reaches the generator so it disappears into the generator. If this is truly power, it must go somewhere else, be dissipated, transformed into some other form or stored (based on the conservation of energy principle). Where did it go? This is a lot like the 1/2WL W7EL example in his food for thought articles. The generator is *NOT* matched to the line as it sees an open circuit and cannot continue to stuff 50 watts into the open circuit. The generator is as mismatched as it can possibly be. The reflected wave also sees that open circuit and is 100% reflected. Since the generator is not delivering any power and there is a forward power and a reflected power, the reflected power is supplying the forward power. Anything else violates the conservation of energy principle. Most correspondents agree that what happens depends on the design of generator; dissipation either increases, decreases or stays the same (compared to when the line was terminated in 50 Ohms and the power going down the line is dissipated in the termination). This does not make an easy explanation for where that supposedly real power goes. Of course, if it is not real power, then there is no issue, which leads one back to looking for explanations other than "reverse power". Any level of interference is possible depending upon the phase angle between the forward E-field and the reflected E-field. All this is explained in "Optics" by Hecht which some people have apparently avoided reading/understanding. Optical physicists solved this problem a century ago. They don't have the luxury of dealing with voltages and currents and are forced to deal with power densities. You should try trodding their paths and enlightening yourself. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The power explanation | Antenna | |||
| again a few words of explanation | General | |||
| again a few words of explanation | Policy | |||
| Explanation wanted | Antenna | |||
| New ham needing explanation on radios | General | |||