Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
I see you are back to using S parameters to disguise the fact you are using about Vf and Vr in trying to support your "power wave" explanation of what happens on the transmission line. Others use the term "power wave", Owen, but *I DO NOT* so please stop accusing me of something of which I am not guilty. I use the term "EM RF energy wave" for the traveling waves under discussion. When anyone can prove that RF energy waves don't exist or are not associated with EM energy or don't move at the speed of light, I will retire from the argument. Good luck on that one. S parameters are ratios of Vf and Vr. Exactly! No disguise intended - it's just additional support from the well respected field of S-parameter analysis for the distributed network wave reflection model. The only difference is that the S-parameter Vf and Vr values are normalized to Z0 so when they are squared they indeed do yield watts. Your tone seems to reject the S-Parameter analysis as a valid model of reality. Any model that has to resort to rejecting the S-Parameter analysis as well as the distributed network wave reflection model is certainly suspect. Did you ever see the movie, "One Bridge Too Far"? This "reflected wave energy doesn't exist" argument reminds me of that movie. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The power explanation | Antenna | |||
again a few words of explanation | General | |||
again a few words of explanation | Policy | |||
Explanation wanted | Antenna | |||
New ham needing explanation on radios | General |