Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 07, 09:10 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Revisiting the Power Explanation

Gene Fuller wrote:
Utter nonsense. I have never said any such thing.


Yes, you did, in the part that you deleted. Here it
is again:

Gene Fuller, W4SZ wrote:
In a standing wave antenna problem, such as the one you describe,
there is no remaining phase information. Any specific phase
characteristics of the traveling waves died out when the startup
transients died out.

Phase is gone. Kaput. Vanished. Cannot be recovered. Never to be
seen again.


What I *did* say, and it is still true today, is that there is no
difference between a standing wave and its *constituent* traveling wave
components.


The constituent traveling wave components possess changing
phase. The standing wave doesn't possess changing phase.
You are contradicting yourself.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 07, 11:12 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 342
Default Revisiting the Power Explanation

Cecil Moore wrote:
Gene Fuller wrote:
Utter nonsense. I have never said any such thing.


Yes, you did, in the part that you deleted. Here it
is again:

Gene Fuller, W4SZ wrote:
In a standing wave antenna problem, such as the one you describe,
there is no remaining phase information. Any specific phase
characteristics of the traveling waves died out when the startup
transients died out.

Phase is gone. Kaput. Vanished. Cannot be recovered. Never to be
seen again.


What I *did* say, and it is still true today, is that there is no
difference between a standing wave and its *constituent* traveling
wave components.


The constituent traveling wave components possess changing
phase. The standing wave doesn't possess changing phase.
You are contradicting yourself.


Cecil,

Sorry, I thought that English was your native tongue. Would you like me
to try to translate into another preferred language?

Hint: I stand by everything I have said in the quotes above. No
contradictions at all.

73,
Gene
W4SZ
  #3   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 07, 11:48 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Revisiting the Power Explanation

Gene Fuller wrote:
Sorry, I thought that English was your native tongue. Would you like me
to try to translate into another preferred language?


Translation: I've been caught red-handed by
my own American English words. Maybe converting
to an obscure foreign language would give me more
wiggle room.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The power explanation Owen Duffy Antenna 48 March 15th 07 06:01 PM
again a few words of explanation Mork Moron Morgan General 2 August 30th 06 02:19 PM
again a few words of explanation an old friend Policy 10 August 30th 06 02:19 PM
Explanation wanted John, N9JG Antenna 7 May 26th 06 09:02 AM
New ham needing explanation on radios [email protected] General 9 December 22nd 04 09:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017