| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Owen Duffy wrote:
Considering only the attenuator case, you suggest in such a general statement that reflected power always increases the dissipation in a real source that includes an attenuator for the purpose of constraining the equivalent source impedance. Owen, why do you feel compelled to lie about what I said? If the reflected energy is dissipated within the source, it increases the dissipation. If the reflected energy is not dissipated within the source, it does not increase the dissipation. Why is that so hard for you to understand? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The power explanation | Antenna | |||
| again a few words of explanation | General | |||
| again a few words of explanation | Policy | |||
| Explanation wanted | Antenna | |||
| New ham needing explanation on radios | General | |||