LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Report Post  
Old March 27th 07, 11:56 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 588
Default Revisiting the Power Explanation

Richard Clatk, WB7QHC wrote:
"This is, of course, contingent only when the line is terminated in its
characteristic Z."

Lines terminated in Zo don`t produce a reflection at the load. I did not
make up the fact that the line forces the current to be exactlly
in-phase or exactly out-of-phase with the voltage across the
transmission line. I got it from Terman. On page 86 of his 1955 opus:
"---This differs from Eqn (4-8) (Zo seen by the incident wave) only
by the negative sign, which arises from the fact that the current in the
reflected wave travels toward the generator whereas the current in the
incident wave travels toward the load.

Zo is a RESISTANCE. In a resistance, current is in-phase with its
associated voltage. Waves traveling in either direction on a line see
the same Zo.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The power explanation Owen Duffy Antenna 48 March 15th 07 05:01 PM
again a few words of explanation Mork Moron Morgan General 2 August 30th 06 01:19 PM
again a few words of explanation an old friend Policy 10 August 30th 06 01:19 PM
Explanation wanted John, N9JG Antenna 7 May 26th 06 08:02 AM
New ham needing explanation on radios [email protected] General 9 December 22nd 04 08:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017