| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 28, 11:40 pm, Dan Bloomquist wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Keith Dysart wrote: And just for greater certainty, I forgot to mention that the reflection coefficient from the line to the generator is 0 in my experiment (generator impedance is equal to the line characteristic impedance) so using the reflection coefficient, there are no reflections. Because it is an active source, not a passive resistor, your reflection coefficient is wrong. He will completely ignore this and keep insisting on his truth. Me thinks he is trolling...... Good day Dan, I offer you the same challenge as Cecil, find the error in my analysis and then compute the correct amount of re-reflection. And provide the expression for computing RC in the presence of sources if it is different than the conventional RC=(Z2-Z1)/(Z2+Z1). When you find nothing wrong with the analysis, ask yourself why you don't believe the results? ....Keith |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The power explanation | Antenna | |||
| again a few words of explanation | General | |||
| again a few words of explanation | Policy | |||
| Explanation wanted | Antenna | |||
| New ham needing explanation on radios | General | |||